Direct and indirect fossil records of megachilid bees from the Paleogene of Central Europe (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae).

Authors:
Sonja Wedmann
Sonja Wedmann
Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum
Torsten Wappler
Torsten Wappler
Steinmann Institute
Michael S Engel
Michael S Engel
University of Kansas
United States

Naturwissenschaften 2009 Jun 19;96(6):703-12. Epub 2009 Mar 19.

Forschungsstation Grube Messel, Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Markstrasse 35, 64409 Messel, Germany.

Aside from pollen and nectar, bees of the subfamily Megachilinae are closely associated with plants as a source of materials for nest construction. Megachilines use resins, masticated leaves, trichomes and other plant materials sometimes along with mud to construct nests in cavities or in soil. Among these, the leafcutter bees (Megachile s.l.) are the most famous for their behaviour to line their brood cells with discs cut from various plants. We report on fossil records of one body fossil of a new non-leafcutting megachiline and of 12 leafcuttings from three European sites-Eckfeld and Messel, both in Germany (Eocene), and Menat, France (Paleocene). The excisions include the currently earliest record of probable Megachile activity and suggest the presence of such bees in the Paleocene European fauna. Comparison with extant leafcuttings permits the interpretation of a minimal number of species that produced these excisions. The wide range of size for the leafcuttings indirectly might suggest at least two species of Megachile for the fauna of Messel in addition to the other megachiline bee described here. The presence of several cuttings on most leaves from Eckfeld implies that the preferential foraging behaviour of extant Megachile arose early in megachiline evolution. These results demonstrate that combined investigation of body and trace fossils complement each other in understanding past biodiversity, the latter permitting the detection of taxa not otherwise directly sampled and inferences on behavioural evolution.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-009-0525-xDOI Listing

Still can't find the full text of the article?

Sign up to send a request to the authors directly.
June 2009
126 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fossil records
8
european fauna
4
fauna comparison
4
comparison extant
4
extant leafcuttings
4
paleocene european
4
leafcuttings permits
4
activity presence
4
presence bees
4
bees paleocene
4
megachile activity
4
permits interpretation
4
excisions wide
4
wide range
4
range size
4
produced excisions
4
species produced
4
interpretation minimal
4
minimal number
4
number species
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Article in Beitr Entomol
R Altevogt et al.
Beitr Entomol 1955
Article in Am J Sci
EW Berry et al.
Am J Sci 1931

H Bischoff et al.
1927
Article in Trans R Ent Soc Lond
GE Bohart et al.
Trans R Ent Soc Lond 1972
Article in Psyche
HK Brooks et al.
Psyche 1955
Article in Nature
TDA Cockerell et al.
Nature 1910
Article in Am Mus Novitates
MS Engel et al.
Am Mus Novitates 1999
Article in Bull Am Mus Nat Hist
MS Engel et al.
Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 2001
Article in Rev Tecnologia e Ambiente
MS Engel et al.
Rev Tecnologia e Ambiente 2004
Article in Am Mus Novitates
MS Engel et al.
Am Mus Novitates 2005
Article in Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung
MS Engel et al.
Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung 2008

Similar Publications