The effect of femoral component malrotation on patellar biomechanics.

Authors:
Oliver Kessler
Oliver Kessler
University of Zurich
Switzerland
Shantanu Patil
Shantanu Patil
Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education at Scripps Clinic
Clifford W Colwell
Clifford W Colwell
Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education at Scripps Clinic
United States

J Biomech 2008 Dec 18;41(16):3332-9. Epub 2008 Nov 18.

Scientific Affairs, Stryker Europe, Thalwil, Switzerland.

Patellofemoral complications are among the important reasons for revision knee arthroplasty. Femoral component malposition has been implicated in patellofemoral maltracking, which is associated with anterior knee pain, subluxation, fracture, wear, and aseptic loosening. Rotating-platform mobile bearings compensate for malrotation between the tibial and femoral components and may, therefore, reduce any associated patellofemoral maltracking. To test this hypothesis, we developed a dynamic model of quadriceps-driven open-kinetic-chain extension in a knee implanted with arthroplasty components. The model was validated using tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics and forces measured in cadaver knees. Knee kinematics and patellofemoral forces were measured after simulating malrotation (+/-3 degrees ) of the femoral component. Rotational alignment of the femoral component affected tibial rotation near full extension and tibial adduction at higher flexion angles. External rotation of the femoral component increased patellofemoral lateral tilt, lateral shift, and lateral shear forces. Up to 21 degrees of bearing rotation relative to the tibia was noted in the rotating-bearing condition. However, the rotating bearing had minimal effect in reducing the patellofemoral maltracking or shear induced by femoral component rotation. The rotating platform does not appear to be forgiving of malalignment of the extensor mechanism resulting from femoral component malrotation. These results support the value of improving existing methodologies for accurate femoral component alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.09.032DOI Listing
December 2008
13 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

femoral component
32
patellofemoral maltracking
12
femoral
9
forces measured
8
knee arthroplasty
8
component malrotation
8
patellofemoral
7
component
7
knee
5
extension tibial
4
component tibial
4
full extension
4
rotation
4
rotation full
4
tibial rotation
4
higher flexion
4
rotation femoral
4
component increased
4
increased patellofemoral
4
patellofemoral lateral
4

Similar Publications

Extensor malalignment arising from femoral component malrotation in knee arthroplasty: effect of rotating-bearing.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2011 Jan;26(1):52-7

Shilley Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education at Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA 92037, United States.

Background: many patellofemoral complications such as anterior knee pain, subluxation, fracture, wear, and aseptic loosening after total knee arthroplasty are attributed to malrotation of the femoral component. Rotating-platform mobile bearings can reduce malrotation between the tibial and femoral components and may also improve patellofemoral maltracking.

Methods: a computer model (LifeMOD/KneeSIM) of a weight-bearing deep knee bend was validated using cadaver knees tested in an Oxford-type knee rig. Read More

View Article
January 2011

Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty.

Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001 Nov(392):38-45

Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA.

Femoral component rotation is important in total knee arthroplasty to optimize patellofemoral and tibiofemoral kinematics. More recently, the epicondylar axis has been cited as the definitive landmark for femoral component rotation. However, there are few studies to support the validity of this rotational landmark and its effect on the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral articulations. Read More

View Article
November 2001

The effect of component placement on knee kinetics after arthroplasty with an unconstrained prosthesis.

J Orthop Res 2001 Jul;19(4):614-20

School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA.

The mechanical success of a total knee replacement demands stable patellar tracking without subluxation and, stable tracking, in turn, can depend largely on the medial-lateral forces restraining the patella. Patellar button medialization has been advocated as a means of reducing subluxation, and experimental evidence has shown femoral component rotation also affects medial-lateral forces. Surgeons have choices in femoral component rotation and patellar button medialization and must frequently make intra-operative decisions concerning component placement because of anatomical variations among patients. Read More

View Article
July 2001

Patellofemoral forces after total knee arthroplasty: effect of extensor moment arm.

Knee 2005 Apr;12(2):81-8

Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Scripps Clinic Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education, 11025 N Torrey Pines Road, Suite 140, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.

Total knee arthroplasty implant designs with larger extensor moment arms theoretically should generate lower extensor forces for the same externally applied loads. This study measured knee kinematics, quadriceps forces, and patellofemoral forces under conditions of dynamic knee extension under load in two knee designs with differing quadriceps moment arms. Six human cadaver knees were tested both before implantation and after sequential implantation with two posterior cruciate retaining designs. Read More

View Article
April 2005