Cost-effectiveness of a school-based obesity prevention program.

Authors:
Dr. Justin B Moore, PhD, MS
Dr. Justin B Moore, PhD, MS
Wake Forest School of Medicine
Associate Professor
Implementation Science, Epidemiology
Winston-Salem, NC | United States

J Sch Health 2008 Dec;78(12):619-24

Division of Adolescent and School Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.

Background: A school-based obesity prevention study (Medical College of Georgia FitKid Project) started in the fall of 2003 in 18 elementary schools. Half of the schools were randomized to an after-school program that included moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, healthy snacks, homework assistance, and academic enrichment. All third graders were invited to enroll. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness (CE) of the first-year intervention.

Methods: Standard CE analysis methods and a societal perspective were used. Program delivery costs incurred during the first-year intervention and the usual after-school care costs that would occur in the absence of the intervention were estimated (in 2003 dollars). Net intervention costs were calculated by subtracting the usual after-school care costs from the intervention costs. The effectiveness of the intervention was measured as percent body fat (%BF) reduction compared with a control condition. The CE was assessed as the net intervention cost divided by the effectiveness of the intervention.

Results: The intervention costs totaled $174,070, $558/student, or $956/student who attended > or = 40% of the intervention sessions. The usual after-school care costs were estimated at $639/student. Students who attended > or = 40% of the intervention reduced %BF by 0.76% (95% confidence interval: -1.42 to -0.09) at an additional cost of $317/student.

Conclusions: Subjects who attended > or = 40% of the intervention achieved a significant reduction in %BF at a relatively low cost. School-based obesity prevention programs of this type are likely to be a cost-effective use of public funds and warrant careful consideration by policy makers and program planners.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00357.xDOI Listing
December 2008
46 Reads
20 Citations
1.660 Impact Factor

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intervention costs
12
40% intervention
12
attended 40%
12
usual after-school
12
obesity prevention
12
care costs
12
school-based obesity
12
after-school care
12
intervention
10
net intervention
8
costs
7
societal perspective
4
perspective program
4
program delivery
4
incurred first-year
4
intervention usual
4
first-year intervention
4
costs incurred
4
delivery costs
4
intervention sessions
4

Similar Publications