A pilot phase-II prospective study to test the 'efficacy' and tolerability of a penile-extender device in the treatment of 'short penis'.

Authors:
Paolo Gontero
Paolo Gontero
University of Turin
Italy
Gianluca Giubilei
Gianluca Giubilei
University of Florence
Italy
Riccardo Bartoletti
Riccardo Bartoletti
University of Florence
Italy
Alessandro Tizzani
Alessandro Tizzani
University of Turin
Torino | Italy
Nicola Mondaini
Nicola Mondaini
University of Florence
Italy

BJU Int 2009 Mar 16;103(6):793-7. Epub 2008 Oct 16.

Dipartimento di Discipline Medico Chirurgiche, Urologia 1, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Objective: To assess a commonly marketed brand of penile extender, the Andro-Penis(R) (Andromedical, Madrid, Spain), widely used devices which aim to increase penile size, in a phase II single-arm study powered to detect significant changes in penile size, as despite their widespread use, there is little scientific evidence to support their potential clinical utility in the treatment of patients with inadequate penile dimensions.

Patients And Methods: Fifteen patients were required to test the efficacy of the device, assuming an effect size of >0.8. Eligible patients were counselled how to use the penile extender for at least 4 h/day for 6 months. Penile dimensions were measured at baseline and after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months (end of study). The erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of EF was administered at baseline and at the end of the study. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using an institutional unvalidated five-item questionnaire.

Results: After 6 months the mean gain in length was significant, meeting the goals of the effect size, at 2.3 and 1.7 cm for the flaccid and stretched penis, respectively. No significant changes in penile girth were detected. The EF domain scores improved significantly at the end of study. Treatment satisfaction scores were consistent with acceptable to good improvement in all items, except for penile girth, where the score was either 'no change' or 'mild improvement'.

Conclusions: Penile extenders should be regarded as a minimally invasive and effective treatment option to elongate the penile shaft in patients seeking treatment for a short penis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08083.xDOI Listing

Still can't find the full text of the article?

We can help you send a request to the authors directly.
March 2009
59 Reads

Article Mentions


Provided by Crossref Event Data
twitter
Twitter: Lastfortune_R
August 20, 2018, 6:18 am EST
twitter
Twitter: KimForna
August 20, 2018, 5:36 am EST
twitter
Twitter: Hoyu10004
August 20, 2018, 5:34 am EST
twitter
Twitter: Headiff
August 20, 2018, 5:27 am EST
twitter
Twitter: Ch___SaNa
August 20, 2018, 5:14 am EST
twitter
Twitter: Cooker_libre
August 20, 2018, 5:14 am EST
twitter
Twitter: Eertelpam
August 20, 2018, 5:13 am EST
twitter
Twitter: UnclarifiedO
August 20, 2018, 4:29 am EST
wikipedia
Wikipedia: User talk:Andro-peyronie
February 16, 2018, 1:08 pm EST
wikipedia
Wikipedia: Talk:Penis enlargement
May 19, 2017, 10:43 pm EST
wikipedia
Wikipedia: Agrandamiento del pene
April 15, 2017, 7:56 pm EST
twitter
Twitter: Andromedical
March 3, 2017, 4:46 am EST

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

penile
10
penile size
8
penile girth
8
changes penile
8
treatment satisfaction
8
study treatment
8
penile extender
8
treatment
6
study
5
assuming size
4
device assuming
4
size >08
4
improvement items
4
eligible patients
4
extender h/day
4
h/day months
4
months penile
4
counselled penile
4
patients counselled
4
items penile
4

Similar Publications