Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales.

Authors:
Mr Dipen K Menon, MS (Orth) AIIMS, FRCS (England & Glasgow), MCh (Orth) Liverpool, FRCS (Engl
Mr Dipen K Menon, MS (Orth) AIIMS, FRCS (England & Glasgow), MCh (Orth) Liverpool, FRCS (Engl
Kettering General Hospital (Affiliated teaching hospital: University of Leicester)
Consultant in Trauma & Orthopaedics
Lower Limb Arthroplasty, Revision Hip and Knee replacement, Arthroscopic Knee Surgery, ACL Reconstruction, Foot & Ankle Surgery
Kettering, Northamptonshire | United Kingdom

J Foot Ankle Surg 2007 Mar-Apr;46(2):65-74

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kettering General Hospital, United Kingdom.

This study evaluates the criterion validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) clinical rating scales by correlating scores obtained with these rating scales to scores obtained with the Foot Function Index (FFI) in patients with foot and ankle conditions. To date, the AOFAS scoring scales have not been shown to provide valid information despite their popularity. The FFI, on the other hand, has previously been shown to provide valid information in regard to conditions affecting the foot and ankle. A moderately strong inverse criterion validity correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient = -0.68) was shown when preoperative patients were administered both the AOFAS and FFI questionnaires, and the resultant scores were compared. Test-retest reliability measurements showed no significant difference (P = .27) between preoperative AOFAS scale scores measured at least 2 weeks apart. Construct validity was shown (P = .006) when dependent preoperative and postoperative (at least 3 months) AOFAS scale scores were compared, indicative of the clinical rating scales' ability to discriminate and predict quality of life related to foot and ankle conditions. The moderate level of correlation, satisfactory degree of reliability, and responsiveness (ability to distinguish differences between preoperative and postoperative conditions in the same patient) observed in this study suggest that the subjective component of the AOFAS clinical rating scales provides quality-of-life information that conveys acceptable validity regarding conditions affecting the foot and ankle.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2006.12.002DOI Listing
July 2007
57 Reads
256 Citations
99.999 Impact Factor

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

foot ankle
24
rating scales
16
clinical rating
16
subjective component
12
aofas scale
8
ankle society
8
aofas clinical
8
scale scores
8
criterion validity
8
scores compared
8
conditions foot
8
provide valid
8
component american
8
preoperative postoperative
8
validity subjective
8
american orthopaedic
8
ankle conditions
8
orthopaedic foot
8
foot
7
aofas
6

Similar Publications