A meta-analytic evaluation of the impact of dimension and exercise factors on assessment center ratings.

J Appl Psychol 2006 Sep;91(5):1114-24

Industrial/Organizational Psychology Program, Department of Management, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.

Two recent reviews have attempted to summarize findings quantitatively regarding assessment center (AC) construct-related validity (i.e., Lance, Lambert, Gewin, Lievens, & Conway, 2004; Lievens & Conway, 2001). Unlike these previous studies, which reanalyzed individual multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrices from previously published research, the authors recoded and combined past matrices into a single MTMM matrix. This matrix, comprised of 6 dimensions each measured by 6 exercises, was then analyzed, providing a more generalizable set of results. Both dimensions and exercises were found to contribute substantially to AC ratings. Specific dimensions (i.e., communication, influencing others, organizing and planning, and problem solving) appeared more construct valid than others (i.e., consideration/awareness of others and drive). Implications for AC design and practice are discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1114DOI Listing
September 2006
2 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

assessment center
8
lievens conway
8
mtmm matrices
4
matrices published
4
multitrait-multimethod mtmm
4
organizing planning
4
published authors
4
recoded combined
4
influencing organizing
4
authors recoded
4
individual multitrait-multimethod
4
planning problem
4
solving appeared
4
conway 2001
4
2004 lievens
4
contribute ratings
4
previous studies
4
reanalyzed individual
4
studies reanalyzed
4
problem solving
4

Similar Publications