Do EMS personnel identify, report, and disclose medical errors?

Authors:
Cherri Hobgood
Cherri Hobgood
University of North Carolina School of Medicine
United States
Jane H Brice
Jane H Brice
University of North Carolina
United States
Barbara Overby
Barbara Overby
University of North Carolina
United States
Joshua H Tamayo-Sarver
Joshua H Tamayo-Sarver
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine
United States

Prehosp Emerg Care 2006 Jan-Mar;10(1):21-7

Department of Emergency Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Objective: To evaluate self-reports of prehospital providers' error frequency, disclosure, and reporting in their actual practice and in hypothetical scenarios.

Methods: The authors surveyed a convenience sample of prehospital providers attending a statewide emergency medical services conference using a two-part instrument. Part 1 evaluated respondent demographics and actual practice patterns. Part 2 used hypothetic scenarios to assess error identification, disclosure, and reporting patterns. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used to characterize demographics and practice patterns. For hypothetical scenarios, the authors calculated mean responses with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess error identification, anticipated disclosure, and reporting patterns.

Results: The response rate was 88% (372/425). Analysis was limited to 283 (75% of 372) respondents who were emergency medical technicians and had complete data. In the previous year, 157 (55%) providers identified no errors in practice, 100 (35%) reported one or two errors, and 26 (9%) identified more than two errors. In approximately half of cases, identified errors were reported to the receiving provider, or supervisor. In hypothetical cases, severe errors were identified 93% (95% CI 92-94) of the time, but the ability of providers to identify mild errors significantly varied. In all scenarios, respondents were much more likely to report errors to the receiving hospital, their supervisor, and their medical director than to patients.

Conclusions: Prehospital providers demonstrate the capacity to identify, report, and, to a lesser extent, disclose errors in hypothetical scenarios but may not apply these skills uniformly in their own practices. Enhancing error management skills in prehospital clinical practice will require focused education and training.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10903120500366011DOI Listing
June 2006
10 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

disclosure reporting
12
identified errors
12
errors
8
practice patterns
8
error identification
8
actual practice
8
emergency medical
8
identify report
8
assess error
8
errors identified
8
prehospital providers
8
hypothetical scenarios
8
practice
5
rate 88%
4
capacity identify
4
88% 372/425
4
demonstrate capacity
4
providers demonstrate
4
372 respondents
4
respondents emergency
4

Similar Publications

Error identification, disclosure, and reporting: practice patterns of three emergency medicine provider types.

Acad Emerg Med 2004 Feb;11(2):196-9

Department of Emergency Medicine (CH), The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Objectives: To gather preliminary data on how the three major types of emergency medicine (EM) providers, physicians, nurses (RNs), and out-of-hospital personnel (EMTs), differ in error identification, disclosure, and reporting.

Methods: A convenience sample of emergency department (ED) providers completed a brief survey designed to evaluate error frequency, disclosure, and reporting practices as well as error-based discussion and educational activities.

Results: One hundred sixteen subjects participated: 41 EMTs (35%), 33 RNs (28%), and 42 physicians (36%). Read More

View Article
February 2004

Medical error identification, disclosure, and reporting: do emergency medicine provider groups differ?

Acad Emerg Med 2006 Apr 10;13(4):443-51. Epub 2006 Mar 10.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Objectives: To determine if the three types of emergency medicine providers--physicians, nurses, and out-of-hospital providers (emergency medical technicians [EMTs])--differ in their identification, disclosure, and reporting of medical error.

Methods: A convenience sample of providers in an academic emergency department evaluated ten case vignettes that represented two error types (medication and cognitive) and three severity levels. For each vignette, providers were asked the following: 1) Is this an error? 2) Would you tell the patient? 3) Would you report this to a hospital committee? To assess differences in identification, disclosure, and reporting by provider type, error type, and error severity, the authors constructed three-way tables with the nonparametric Somers' D clustered on participant. Read More

View Article
April 2006

Child and provider restraints in ambulances: knowledge, opinions, and behaviors of emergency medical services providers.

Acad Emerg Med 2006 Aug 6;13(8):886-92. Epub 2006 Jul 6.

Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.

Background: Approximately 16,000 children are transported by ambulances each day, and there are an estimated 4,500 ambulance crashes each year. Information about emergency medical services (EMS) provider knowledge, opinions, and behaviors regarding occupant restraint is lacking.

Objectives: To measure the knowledge, opinions, and behaviors of EMS personnel regarding child and provider restraint use in ambulances. Read More

View Article
August 2006

How does routine disclosure of medical error affect patients' propensity to sue and their assessment of provider quality? Evidence from survey data.

Med Care 2010 Nov;48(11):955-61

School of Public Health, Division of Health Policy and Administration, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.

Background: Although strongly favored by patients and ethically imperative for providers, the disclosure of medical errors to patients remains rare because providers fear that it will trigger lawsuits and jeopardize their reputation. To date little is known how patients might respond to their providers' disclosure of a medical error even when paired with an offer of remediation.

Research Design: A representative sample of Illinois residents was surveyed in 2008 about their knowledge about medical errors, their confidence that their providers would disclose medical errors to them, and their propensity to sue and recommend providers that disclose medical errors and offer to remedy them. Read More

View Article
November 2010