Evolutionary genetics: Ambiguous role of CCR5 in Y. pestis infection.

Nature 2004 Jul;430(6998):417

Defence Science and Technology Laboratories, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JQ, UK.

Mecsas and colleagues suggest that a deficiency in the chemokine receptor CCR5 in humans is unlikely to confer protection against plague, based on their study of Yersinia pestis infection in Ccr5-deficient mice. They were testing the hypothesis that a mutation in the CCR5 gene, frequently found in Caucasians, may have been selected for in the past because it provided protection against (bubonic) plague; the mutation, called CCR5Delta32, is characterized by a 32-base-pair deletion. We have also tested this hypothesis by using Y. pestis infection in mice and, in addition, we have done phagocytosis experiments with macrophages from wild-type and Ccr5-deficient mice. Although, like Mecsas et al., we did not see any difference in the survival of the two groups of mice, we did find that there was a significantly reduced uptake of Y. pestis by Ccr5-deficient macrophages in vitro. Our results indicate that the role of Ccr5 in Y. pestis infection may therefore be more complex than previously thought.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02822DOI Listing
July 2004
30 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pestis infection
16
ccr5-deficient mice
8
ccr5 pestis
8
role ccr5
8
pestis
5
plague mutation
4
caucasians selected
4
find reduced
4
selected provided
4
bubonic plague
4
provided protection
4
frequently caucasians
4
protection bubonic
4
mice find
4
mutation called
4
hypothesis mutation
4
testing hypothesis
4
macrophages wild-type
4
mutation ccr5
4
uptake pestis
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

J Mecsas et al.
Nature 2004

C Blanpain et al.
Recept. Chann. 2002

M Samson et al.
Nature 1996

R Liu et al.
Cell 1996

M Dean et al.
Science 1996

JC Stephens et al.
Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1998

F Libert et al.
Hum. Mol. Genet. 1998

J Parkhill et al.
Nature 2001

BW Wren et al.
Nature Rev. Microbiol. 2003

CO Jarrett et al.
Infect. Immun. 2004

Similar Publications