Theoretical and experimental studies of biotin analogues that bind almost as tightly to streptavidin as biotin.

Authors:
Richard W Dixon
Richard W Dixon
University of California
United States
Randall J Radmer
Randall J Radmer
Stanford University
United States
Bernd Kuhn
Bernd Kuhn
Princeton University
United States
Jaemoon Yang
Jaemoon Yang
Yonsei University
South Korea
Craig S Wilcox
Craig S Wilcox
University of Pittsburgh
United States
Lisa A Klumb
Lisa A Klumb
University of California
United States

J Org Chem 2002 Mar;67(6):1827-37

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco 94143, USA.

We have used a newly developed qualitative computational approach, PROFEC (Pictorial Representation of Free Energy Changes), to visualize the areas of the ligand biotin where modifications of its structure might lead to tighter binding to the protein streptavidin. The PROFEC analysis, which includes protein flexibility and ligand solvation/desolvation, led to the suggestion that the pro-9R hydrogen atom of biotin, which is in alpha-position to the CO(2)(-) group, might be changed to a larger group and lead to better binding with streptavidin and avidin. Free energy calculations supported this suggestion and predicted that the methyl analogue should bind approximately 3 kcal/mol more tightly to streptavidin, with this difference coming exclusively from the relative desolvation free energy of the ligand. The PROFEC analysis further suggested little or no improvement for changing the pro-9S hydrogen atom to a methyl group, and great reduction in changing the ureido N-H groups to N-CH(3). Stimulated by these results, we synthesized 9R-methylbiotin and 9S-methylbiotin, and their binding free energies and enthalpies were measured for interaction with streptavidin and avidin, respectively. In contrast to the calculated results, experiments found both 9-methylbiotin isomers to bind more weakly to streptavidin than biotin. The calculated preference for the binding of the 9R- over the 9S-stereoisomer was observed. In addition, 9-methylbiotin is considerably less soluble in water than biotin, as predicted by the calculation, and the 9R isomer is, to our knowledge, thus far the tightest binding analogue of biotin to streptavidin. Subsequently, X-ray structures of the complexes between streptavidin and both 9R- and 9S-methylbiotin were determined, and the structures were consistent with those used in the free energy calculations. Thus, the reason for the discrepancy between the calculated and experimental binding free energy does not lie in unusual binding modes for the 9-methylbiotins.

Still can't find the full text of the article?

Sign up to send a request to the authors directly.
March 2002
4 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

free energy
20
streptavidin
8
tightly streptavidin
8
binding free
8
profec analysis
8
hydrogen atom
8
streptavidin biotin
8
energy calculations
8
streptavidin avidin
8
binding
7
biotin
7
free
6
energy
5
groups n-ch3
4
n-ch3 stimulated
4
changing ureido
4
ureido n-h
4
calculated experiments
4
stimulated synthesized
4
n-h groups
4

Similar Publications