Search our Database of Scientific Publications and Authors

I’m looking for a

    Details and Download Full Text PDF:
    Theoretical and experimental studies of biotin analogues that bind almost as tightly to streptavidin as biotin.

    J Org Chem 2002 Mar;67(6):1827-37
    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco 94143, USA.
    We have used a newly developed qualitative computational approach, PROFEC (Pictorial Representation of Free Energy Changes), to visualize the areas of the ligand biotin where modifications of its structure might lead to tighter binding to the protein streptavidin. The PROFEC analysis, which includes protein flexibility and ligand solvation/desolvation, led to the suggestion that the pro-9R hydrogen atom of biotin, which is in alpha-position to the CO(2)(-) group, might be changed to a larger group and lead to better binding with streptavidin and avidin. Free energy calculations supported this suggestion and predicted that the methyl analogue should bind approximately 3 kcal/mol more tightly to streptavidin, with this difference coming exclusively from the relative desolvation free energy of the ligand. The PROFEC analysis further suggested little or no improvement for changing the pro-9S hydrogen atom to a methyl group, and great reduction in changing the ureido N-H groups to N-CH(3). Stimulated by these results, we synthesized 9R-methylbiotin and 9S-methylbiotin, and their binding free energies and enthalpies were measured for interaction with streptavidin and avidin, respectively. In contrast to the calculated results, experiments found both 9-methylbiotin isomers to bind more weakly to streptavidin than biotin. The calculated preference for the binding of the 9R- over the 9S-stereoisomer was observed. In addition, 9-methylbiotin is considerably less soluble in water than biotin, as predicted by the calculation, and the 9R isomer is, to our knowledge, thus far the tightest binding analogue of biotin to streptavidin. Subsequently, X-ray structures of the complexes between streptavidin and both 9R- and 9S-methylbiotin were determined, and the structures were consistent with those used in the free energy calculations. Thus, the reason for the discrepancy between the calculated and experimental binding free energy does not lie in unusual binding modes for the 9-methylbiotins.

    Similar Publications

    Absolute and relative binding free energy calculations of the interaction of biotin and its analogs with streptavidin using molecular dynamics/free energy perturbation approaches.
    Proteins 1993 Jul;16(3):226-45
    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco 94143.
    We present calculations of the absolute and relative binding free energies of complexation of streptavidin with biotin and its analogs by means of a thermodynamic free energy perturbation method implemented with molecular dynamics. Using the recently solved crystal structure of the streptavidin-biotin complex, biotin was mutated into a dummy molecule as well as thiobiotin and iminobiotin both in the protein and in solution. The calculated absolute binding free energy was dependent on the simulation model used. Read More
    Electronic structure, binding energy, and solvation structure of the streptavidin-biotin supramolecular complex: ONIOM and 3D-RISM study.
    J Phys Chem B 2009 Jul;113(29):9958-67
    National Institute for Nanotechnology, 11421 Saskatchewan Drive, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2M9, Canada.
    We studied the electronic structure of the binding site of the streptavidin-biotin complex by using the ONIOM method at the HF/STO-3G:UFF level and obtained the solvation structure of the complex by using the statistical-mechanical, three-dimensional molecular theory of solvation (aka three-dimensional reference interaction site model, 3D-RISM-KH). All the streptavidin residues located within 3 A of the biotin residue were included in the quantum mechanical (QM) layer. In total, 16 residues including biotin with 274 atoms were in the QM layer, in which five residues are responsible for the hydrophobic interactions and nine residues for the hydrogen-bonding/electrostatic interaction with biotin. Read More
    What determines the van der Waals coefficient beta in the LIE (linear interaction energy) method to estimate binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations?
    Proteins 1999 Feb;34(3):395-402
    Graduate Group in Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco 94143, USA.
    Recently a semiempirical method has been proposed by Aqvist et al. to calculate absolute and relative binding free energies. In this method, the absolute binding free energy of a ligand is estimated as deltaGbind = alpha + beta, where Vel(bound) and Vvdw(bound) are the electrostatic and van der Waals interaction energies between the ligand and the solvated protein from an molecular dynamics (MD) trajectory with ligand bound to protein and Vel(free) and Vel(free) and Vvdw(free) are the electrostatic and van der Waals interaction energies between the ligand and the water from an MD trajectory with the ligand in water. Read More
    The high-resolution structure of (+)-epi-biotin bound to streptavidin.
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2006 Jun 12;62(Pt 6):576-81. Epub 2006 May 12.
    Departments of Biological Structure and Biochemistry, Biomolecular Structure Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
    (+)-Epi-biotin differs from (+)-biotin in the configuration of the chiral center at atom C2. This could lead to a difference in the mode of binding of (+)-epi-biotin to streptavidin, a natural protein receptor for (+)-biotin. Diffraction data were collected to a maximum of 0. Read More