Publications by authors named "Usama Riaz"

2 Publications

  • Page 1 of 1

An artificial intelligence that increases simulated brain-computer interface performance.

J Neural Eng 2021 05 13;18(4). Epub 2021 May 13.

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, United States of America.

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) translate neural activity into control signals for assistive devices in order to help people with motor disabilities communicate effectively. In this work, we introduce a new BCI architecture that improves control of a BCI computer cursor to type on a virtual keyboard.Our BCI architecture incorporates an external artificial intelligence (AI) that beneficially augments the movement trajectories of the BCI. This AI-BCI leverages past user actions, at both long (100 s of seconds ago) and short (100 s of milliseconds ago) timescales, to modify the BCI's trajectories.We tested our AI-BCI in a closed-loop BCI simulator with nine human subjects performing a typing task. We demonstrate that our AI-BCI achieves: (1) categorically higher information communication rates, (2) quicker ballistic movements between targets, (3) improved precision control to 'dial in' on targets, and (4) more efficient movement trajectories. We further show that our AI-BCI increases performance across a wide control quality spectrum from poor to proficient control.This AI-BCI architecture, by increasing BCI performance across all key metrics evaluated, may increase the clinical viability of BCI systems.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/abfaaaDOI Listing
May 2021

Discrediting microscopic pyuria and leucocyte esterase as diagnostic surrogates for infection in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: results from a clinical and laboratory evaluation.

BJU Int 2013 Jul 10;112(2):231-8. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

Research Department of Clinical Physiology, University College London (UCL), UK.

Unlabelled: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: Microscopic pyuria is widely used as a surrogate marker of infection, although there is little data supporting its use in patients who present with non-acute LUTS. The effects of urinary storage, preservation, and the use of laboratory methods to enhance leucocyte detection, are also unclear. This large, prospective study highlights the poor performance of dipstick urine analysis, and direct microscopy, as surrogate markers of UTI in patients with LUTS. A series of laboratory analyses also examine the effects of urine handling and processing on test integrity, which have important implications for clinical practice.

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of pyuria as a surrogate marker of urinary tract infection (UTI) in patients with chronic lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and determine the impact of sample storage, cytocentrifugation, and staining techniques, on test performance.

Patients And Methods: Between 2008 and 2011, we recruited 1223 patients (120 men; 1103 women; mean age 54 years) with one or more LUTS from a specialist urological outpatient service. We conducted a prospective observational study to determine the performance of microscopic pyuria ≥10 wbc/μL as a surrogate marker of UTI in patients with LUTS. All patients provided clean-catch midstream urine (MSU) samples for analysis, and routine microbiological cultures were used as our reference standard. We also scrutinised the performance of dipstick leucocyte esterase ≥ 'trace' in the detection of microscopic pyuria. The influence of sample handling and processing on test performance was examined in a series of laboratory studies. The effects of storage on leucocyte decay were determined using repeated microscopic assessments of individual urine samples, to plot temporal changes in leucocyte numbers. This study used varied storage conditions (≈20 °C and 4 °C), and boric acid preservation. Paired microscopic assessments were used to determine the effects of centrifugation on leucocyte salvage in spun/unspun samples (relative centrifugal force range 39-157 g). Similar methods were used to assess microscopic leucocyte quantification in stained/unstained urine (Sternheimer-Malbin protocol).

Results: The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of pyuria as a surrogate marker of UTI were 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.43) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.73-0.76), respectively. The dipstick was unable to identify significant microscopic pyuria (≥10 wbc/μL) in 60% of the samples: PPV 0.51 (95% CI 0.48-0.55); NPV 0.75 (95% CI 0.73-0.76). Microscopic pyuria performed poorly as a surrogate of UTI defined by bacterial culture. Whilst refrigeration and preservation did retard leucocyte loss (F = 11; DF = 2; P < 0.001), 40% of cells were still lost by 4 h. Centrifugation had an unpredictable influence on cell salvage (coefficient of variation 5750%) and the use of staining to improve leucocyte detection proved ineffective (Z = -0.356; P = 0.72).

Conclusions: Pyuria performs badly as a surrogate of UTI in patients with LUTS. This is exacerbated by cell loss during storage, and neither centrifugation, nor staining, appears to confer any diagnostic advantage. Clinicians should be alerted to the significant limitations of these tests.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11694.xDOI Listing
July 2013
-->