J Phys Chem A 2005 Mar;109(11):2660-79
Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9.
Ab initio molecular orbital computations were carried out at three levels of theory: RHF/3-21G, RHF/6-31G(d), and B3LYP/6-31G(d), on four model systems of the amino acid proline, HCO-Pro-NH2 [I], HCO-Pro-NH-Me [II], MeCO-Pro-NH2 [III], and MeCO-Pro-NH-Me [IV], representing a systematic variation in the protecting N- and C-terminal groups. Three previously located backbone conformations, gammaL, epsilonL, and alphaL, were characterized together with two ring-puckered forms syn (gauche+ = g+) or "DOWN" and anti (gauche- = g-) or "UP", as well as trans-trans, trans-cis, cis-trans, and cis-cis peptide bond isomers. The topologies of the conformational potential energy cross-sections (PECS) of the potential energy hypersurfaces (PEHS) for compounds [I]-[IV] were explored and analyzed in terms of potential energy curves (PEC), and HCO-Pro-NH2 [I] was also analyzed in terms of potential energy surfaces (PESs). Thermodynamic functions were also calculated for HCO-Pro-NH2 [I] at the CBS-4M and G3MP2 levels of theory. The study confirms that the use of the simplest model, compound [I] with P(N) = P(C) = H, along with the RHF/3-21G level of theory, is an acceptable practice for the analysis of peptide models because only minor differences in geometry and stability are observed.