Publications by authors named "Maurício B Pereira"

4 Publications

  • Page 1 of 1

Diathermy for 23-gauge sclerotomy: a functional and morphologic study to avoid ocular hypotony.

Clin Ophthalmol 2019 4;13:1703-1710. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

Department of Ophthalmology, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.

Purpose: To evaluate diathermy to minimize sclerotomy leakage during small-gauge vitrectomy and prevent ocular hypotony.

Methods: This observational prospective study included 327 patients (327 eyes) who underwent diathermy to close the sclerotomy sites during 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). All patients were operated by a single surgeon (ED) and evaluated at 30 and 60 days postoperatively. Patients with glaucoma, topical/systemic steroids use exceeding 30 days, ocular inflammation, or trauma were excluded. Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher Exact test, and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to evaluate potential risk factors. The primary outcomes were open sclerotomies, leakage, and ocular hypotony.

Results: Sclerotomies remained open in 12 (3.6%) and 2 (0.6%) patients, respectively, at 30 and 60 days postoperatively, revealing no case of ocular hypotony. Leakage only occurred in four patients (1.2%) during week 1 postoperatively. Multivariate analysis indicated that additional vitreoretinal surgeries and longer surgeries were risk factors for persistent sclerotomy opening.

Conclusion: Diathermy was safe and feasible to close sclerotomies. Vitreoretinal surgery reoperations and longer surgeries were the most significant (<0.05) risk factors for persistent sclerotomy opening, which may be functionally closed without evidence of leakage or ocular hypotony.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S209813DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6732740PMC
September 2019

New eye speculum for pars plana vitrectomy.

Retina 2010 Oct;30(9):1549-50

Department of Ophthalmology, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181f04957DOI Listing
October 2010

Retinal detachment in eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for removal of retained lens fragments.

Ophthalmology 2003 Apr;110(4):709-13; discussion 713-4

Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

Purpose: To investigate the incidence and outcomes of retinal detachment (RD) associated with retained lens fragments removed by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).

Design: Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional consecutive case series.

Participants: All patients who underwent PPV for retained lens material after cataract surgery at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2001.

Methods: Demographic and clinical data were extracted from patients' medical records.

Main Outcome Measures: Incidence of retinal detachment, reattachment rate, and visual acuity outcome.

Results: RD occurred in 44 of 343 (12.8%) patients, including 25 (7.3%) before or during PPV and 19 (5.5%) after PPV. The RD was macula-on in 22 of 44 (50%) patients and macula-off in 22 of 44 (50%) patients. The RD was associated with a giant retinal tear in 7 of 44 (15.9%) patients, limited suprachoroidal hemorrhage in 3 of 44 (6.8%) patients, and endophthalmitis in 4 of 44 (9.1%) patients. Retinal reattachment was achieved in 40 of 44 (90.9%) patients; 14 of 44 (31.8%) patients underwent one or more additional procedures for recurrent detachment. Final visual acuity in the patients in this series was >/=20/40 in 8 of 44 (18%), 20/50 to 20/100 in 13 of 44 (30%), 20/200 to 5/200 in 13 of 44 (30%), and <5/200 in 10 of 44 (23%). In the 36 patients with vision less than 20/40, the primary causes of decreased vision were attributed to prior history of RD in 8 of 36 (22.2%), corneal edema in 7 of 36 (19.4%), cystoid macular edema in 5 of 36 (13.9%), persistent retinal detachment in 4/36 (11.1%), preexisting primary open-angle glaucoma in 4 of 36 (11.1%), age-related macular degeneration in 3 of 36 (8.3%), epiretinal membrane in 2 of 36 (5.5%), macular hole in 1 of 36 (2.7%), optic atrophy in 1 of 36 (2.7%), and irregular astigmatism in 1 of 36 (2.7%) patients.

Conclusions: RD is a frequent complication in eyes undergoing PPV for removal of retained lens fragments. Despite favorable retinal reattachment rates, visual acuity outcomes are often poor in these eyes and are associated with other comorbidities such as corneal edema and cystoid macular edema. Poor initial visual acuity and the presence of a retinal tear at the time of PPV were associated with a higher rate of RD after PPV.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00020-4DOI Listing
April 2003

Local anesthesia with intravenous sedation for surgical repair of selected open globe injuries.

Am J Ophthalmol 2002 Nov;134(5):707-11

Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33101, USA.

Purpose: To report factors associated with the use of local anesthesia with intravenous sedation (local anesthesia/sedation) rather than general anesthesia for surgery for open globe injuries in adult reparable eyes.

Design: Retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative case series.

Methods: Medical records were reviewed of all patients with open globe injuries repaired at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between 1995 and 1999. "Adult reparable eyes" (eyes in patients >/=18 years of age, not treated with primary enucleation or evisceration, followed up >/=2 months) were included.

Results: In all, 220 eyes of 218 patients met inclusion criteria. General anesthesia was employed in 80 of 200 (36%) and local anesthesia/sedation in 140 of 220 (64%). Patients who had local anesthesia/sedation were significantly more likely to have an intraocular foreign body (31% vs 14%; P =.010, chi-square test), better presenting visual acuity (1.8 logMAR [logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution] units vs 2.5 logMAR units; P <.001, t test), more anterior wound location (75% corneal/limbal vs 65%; P =.003, chi-square), shorter wound length (6.3mm vs 10.8mm; P <.001, t test), and dehiscence of previous surgical wound (26% vs 12%; P =.021, chi-square) and were significantly less likely to have an afferent pupillary defect (22% vs 51%; P <.001, chi-square). There was no anesthesia-related complication in either group. The local anesthesia/sedation group had a shorter mean operating time than did the general anesthesia group (78 minutes vs 117 minutes; P <.001, t test). The general anesthesia group had a longer mean follow-up than the local anesthesia/sedation group (20.2 months vs 13.9 months, respectively; P =.002, t test). Change in visual acuity between the presenting and final examinations was similar for open globe injuries repaired with general anesthesia compared with local anesthesia/sedation (0.94 vs 0.72 logMAR units of visual acuity, respectively; P =.16, t test).

Conclusions: Local anesthesia/sedation is a reasonable alternative to general anesthesia for selected patients with open globe injuries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01692-6DOI Listing
November 2002