Publications by authors named "Matthew F Gottbrecht"

2 Publications

  • Page 1 of 1

Evolution of diastolic function algorithms: Implications for clinical practice.

Echocardiography 2018 01 26;35(1):39-46. Epub 2017 Nov 26.

Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

Objective: We undertook this study of echocardiographic classification of diastolic function by three different algorithms to determine: (1) how frequently each algorithm classified patients and (2) how well the results agreed with one another.

Background: Several algorithms exist to grade diastolic function (DF), the Mayo Clinic scheme of Redfield et al (Mayo 2003) and the 2 ASE guideline documents of 2009 and 2016 (ASE 2009 and ASE 2016).

Methods: A total of 200 consecutive echocardiograms were retrospectively analyzed; mean age of patients 60.3 ± 3.5 years, 45% male. Echocardiograms were performed using Intersocietal Accreditation Commission guidelines. Diastolic function was assessed by Mayo 2003 and ASE 2009 and 2016. Coexisting conditions affecting DF analysis, such as mitral annular calcification (MAC), were tabulated. Data were compared using a paired t-test. Concordance between algorithms was assessed using the Kappa statistic.

Results: A total of 117 of 200 studies (58.5%) were excluded for the presence of coexisting conditions (51.5%), poor image quality (2.5%), or incomplete data (4.5%). Thirty-three of the remaining 83 studies (40%) received the same grade of DF based on assessments made using the Mayo 2003 and ASE 2016 algorithms; the Kappa statistic was 0.20. 36 of the 83 studies (43%) received the same grade of DF based on assessments made using the ASE 2009 and ASE 2016 algorithms; the Kappa statistic was 0.25.

Conclusion: Assessment of diastolic function via echocardiography cannot be reliably accomplished in approximately 50% of patients using current guidelines. Further, when studies are suitable for assessment, widely used guidelines yield discordant results.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/echo.13746DOI Listing
January 2018

: A Validated Scoring System for Early Stratification of Neurologic Outcome After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Treated With Targeted Temperature Management.

J Am Heart Assoc 2017 May 20;6(5). Epub 2017 May 20.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) results in significant morbidity and mortality, primarily from neurologic injury. Predicting neurologic outcome early post-OHCA remains difficult in patients receiving targeted temperature management.

Methods And Results: Retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive OHCA patients receiving targeted temperature management (32-34°C) for 24 hours at a tertiary-care center from 2008 to 2012 (development cohort, n=122). The primary outcome was favorable neurologic outcome at hospital discharge, defined as cerebral performance category 1 to 2 (poor 3-5). Patient demographics, pre-OHCA diagnoses, and initial laboratory studies post-resuscitation were compared between favorable and poor neurologic outcomes with multivariable logistic regression used to develop a simple scoring system (). The score ranges 0 to 5 using equally weighted variables: (): coronary artery disease, known pre-OHCA; (): glucose ≥200 mg/dL; (): rhythm of arrest not ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation; (): age >45; (): arterial pH ≤7.0. A validation cohort (n=344) included subsequent patients from the initial site (n=72) and an external quaternary-care health system (n=272) from 2012 to 2014. The c-statistic for predicting neurologic outcome was 0.82 (0.74-0.90, <0.001) in the development cohort and 0.81 (0.76-0.87, <0.001) in the validation cohort. When subdivided by score, similar rates of favorable neurologic outcome were seen in both cohorts, 70% each for low (0-1, n=60), 22% versus 19% for medium (2-3, n=307), and 0% versus 2% for high (4-5, n=99) scores in the development and validation cohorts, respectively.

Conclusions: stratifies neurologic outcomes following OHCA in patients receiving targeted temperature management (32-34°C) using objective data available at hospital presentation, identifying patient subsets with disproportionally favorable ( ≤1) and poor ( ≥4) prognoses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003821DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524053PMC
May 2017