Publications by authors named "Mary K Erdman"

2 Publications

  • Page 1 of 1

Standard Versus Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Assessment of Acetabular Fracture Reduction.

J Orthop Trauma 2020 09;34(9):462-468

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.

Objective: First, to assess the impact of varying computed tomography (CT) radiation dose on surgeon assessment of postfixation acetabular fracture reduction and malpositioned implants. Second, to quantify the accuracy of CT assessments compared with the experimentally set displacement in cadaver specimens. We hypothesized that a CT dose would not affect the assessments and that CT assessments would show a high concordance with known displacement.

Methods: We created posterior wall acetabular fractures in 8 fresh-frozen cadaver hips and reduced them with varying combinations of step and gap displacement. The insertion of an intra-articular screw was randomized. Each specimen had a CT with standard (120 kV), intermediate (100 kV), and low-dose (80 kV) protocols, with and without metal artifact reduction postprocessing. Reviewers quantified gap and step displacement, overall reduction, quality of the scan, and identified intra-articular implants.

Results: There were no significant differences between the CT dose protocols for assessment of gap, step, overall displacement, or the presence of intra-articular screws. Reviewers correctly categorized displacement as anatomic (0-1 mm), imperfect (2-3 mm), or poor (>3 mm) in 27.5%-57.5% of specimens. When the anatomic and imperfect categories were condensed into a single category, these scores improved to 52.5%-82.5%. Intra-articular screws were correctly identified in 56.3% of cases. Interobserver reliability was poor or moderate for all items. Reviewers rated the quality of most scans as "sufficient" (60.0%-72.5%); reviewers more frequently rated the low-dose CT as "inferior" (30.0%) and the standard dose CT as "excellent" (25%).

Conclusion: A CT dose did not affect assessment of displacement, intra-articular screw penetration, or subjective rating of scan quality in the setting of a fixed posterior wall fracture.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001778DOI Listing
September 2020

Revision pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after failure of iliotibial band technique treated with all-epiphyseal technique in a prepubescent with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a case report.

J Pediatr Orthop B 2017 Sep;26(5):470-476

aDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa bChildren's Orthopaedics and Scoliosis Surgery Associates, LLP, All Childrens Hospital/Johns Hopkins Medicine, St Petersburg, Florida, USA.

The increasing number of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and the failure of nonoperative management of these patients has elicited a concordant response in the surgical community to devise reconstruction techniques that stabilize the knee joint without causing iatrogenic growth disturbances. Likewise, the rise in pediatric ACL reconstructions forecasts a consequent rise in revision ACL reconstructions in patients with open physes. In this case report, we describe a prepubescent with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and congenital ACL deficiency, who underwent physeal-sparing iliotibial band ACL reconstruction and revision to an all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction with allograft. We also underscore the lack of evidence addressing graft choice and outcomes for ACL reconstructions in patients with connective tissue disorders.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000298DOI Listing
September 2017
-->