Publications by authors named "Jamila Biramane"

4 Publications

  • Page 1 of 1

Outcomes of immature oocytes collected from ovarian tissue for cryopreservation in adult and prepubertal patients.

Reprod Biomed Online 2017 Jun 20;34(6):575-582. Epub 2017 Mar 20.

Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Campus Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Belgium; Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CUB-Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Belgium.

The efficiency of oocyte in-vitro maturation (IVM) and vitrification procedures after ex-vivo collection from ovarian tissue were assessed according to patient age, number of retrieved oocytes and tissue transport conditions. The combined procedure was performed in 136 patients: 130 adults (mean 27.6 ± 5.6 years) and six prepubertal girls (mean 8.7 ± 2.3 years). A higher mean number of oocytes were collected in girls compared with adults (11.5 ± 8.0 versus 3.8 ± 4.2, respectively, P < 0.001) but the percentage of degenerated oocytes was significantly higher in girls (35.5% versus 17.1%, respectively, P < 0.001). IVM rates were significantly lower in prepubertal than postpubertal population (10.3% versus 28.1%, P = 0.002). In adults, a negative correlation was observed between number of retrieved oocytes and age (P = 0.002; r = -0.271); the correlation was positive between anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and number of collected oocytes (P = 0.002; r = 0.264). IVM rates were not correlated with AMH levels (r = 0.06) or age (r = -0.033). At present, nine oocytes and one embryo have been warmed in four patients and one biochemical pregnancy obtained. This suggests the combined procedure could be an additional option for fertility preservation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.007DOI Listing
June 2017

A randomized controlled trial comparing two vitrification methods versus slow-freezing for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos.

J Assist Reprod Genet 2014 Feb 8;31(2):241-7. Epub 2013 Dec 8.

Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Campus Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium,

Purpose: To compare two different vitrification methods to slow freezing method for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos.

Design: Prospective randomised trial.

Setting: University assisted reproduction centre.

Patient(s): 568 patients (mean age 33.4 ± 5.2) from April 2009 to April 2011.

Methods: 1798 supernumerary good-quality cleavage stage embryos in 645 IVF cycles intended to be cryopreserved were randomly allocated to three groups: slow freezing, vitrification with the Irvine® method, vitrification with the Vitrolife® method.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Embryo survival and cleavage rates, implantation rate.

Results: A total of 1055 embryos were warmed, 836 (79.2%) survived and 676 were finally transferred (64.1%). Post-warming embryos survival rate was significantly higher after vitrification (Irvine: 89.4%; Vitrolife: 87.6%) than after slow freezing (63.8%) (p < 0.001). No differences in survival rates were observed between the two vitrification methods, but a significant higher cleavage rate was observed using Irvine compared to Vitrolife method (p < 0.05). Implantation rate (IR) per embryo replaced and per embryo warmed were respectively 15.8% (41/259) and 12.4% (41/330) for Irvine, 17.0% (40/235) and 12.1% (40/330) for Vitrolife, 21.4% (39/182) and 9.9% (39/395) for slow-freezing (NS).

Conclusions: Both vitrification methods (Irvine and Vitrolife) are more efficient than slow freezing for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos in terms of post-warming survival rate. No significant difference in the implantation rate was observed between the three cryopreservation methods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-013-0145-4DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933602PMC
February 2014

Impact of the assessment of early cleavage in a single embryo transfer policy.

Reprod Biomed Online 2006 Aug;13(2):255-60

Fertility Clinic Erasmus Hospital, Free University of Brussels, French Speaking, Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels Belgium.

The policy of single embryo transfer (SET) adopted for women <36 years old since 1 July 2003, strongly calls for improvement of embryo selection. A total of 196 cycles in which SET was performed were randomly allocated to two groups. In the first group, early cleavage was assessed (ECA) 25 h after insemination. The embryo with the best score that cleaved early, if present, was selected for transfer. In the second group, early cleavage was not assessed (ECNA) and embryo selection was based solely on the embryo score. Ninety-eight cycles were allocated in the ECA and ECNA group respectively. Early cleavage occurred in 64% of cycles and 32.2% of embryos. Patient population and embryo morphology were similar between the two groups, and similar delivery rates were observed (27.6 versus 24.5% respectively in the ECA and ECNA groups). The assessment of early cleavage as additional parameter did not improve the delivery rate in the single embryo transfer policy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60623-2DOI Listing
August 2006

Similar delivery rates in a selected group of patients, for day 2 and day 5 embryos both cultured in sequential medium: a randomized study.

Hum Reprod 2003 Oct;18(10):2145-50

Fertility Clinic, Erasme Hospital, Free University of Brussels, French Speaking, 808, Route de Lennik, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium.

Background: The existence of a real benefit of blastocyst transfer is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to compare, in a prospective randomized trial, the outcome of day 2 and day 5 transfer of human embryos cultured in an 'in-house' sequential medium.

Methods: A total of 193 cycles from 171 patients with less than four previous IVF cycles, <39 years old and with four or more zygotes on day 1, were randomly allocated to day 2 (94 cycles) or day 5 (99 cycles) transfer. Zygotes were kept in fertilization medium until 18 h post-fertilization and then placed in a 'glucose-free' cleavage medium. Embryos allocated for day 5 transfer were placed in a blastocyst medium 66 h post-fertilization. Two or three embryos were replaced according to the morphology.

Results: A mean (+/- SEM) number of 2.1 +/- 0.4 and 1.9 +/- 0.3 embryos were replaced on day 2 and day 5 (P < 0.001) respectively. Delivery rates per transfer were 44.1 and 37.1% [P = not significant (NS)], implantation rates were 31.4 and 29.4% (NS) and multiple delivery rates 22 and 36% (NS) for day 2 and day 5 groups respectively. Ten patients (10.1%) had no blastocysts available for transfer.

Conclusions: No clear benefits were observed using blastocyst transfer for patients aged <39 years who had had less than four previous IVF cycle attempts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg394DOI Listing
October 2003
-->