Publications by authors named "Fazlı Yağız Yedekçi"

4 Publications

  • Page 1 of 1

A hesitated approach: primary radiotherapy for keloids-a case series.

Strahlenther Onkol 2021 Jan 4. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) alone in treatment-resistant symptomatic keloids.

Methods: Six patients with a total of 13 inoperable large keloid lesions and no response to previous treatments were admitted to our department between 2017 and 2019. All patients were examined for detailed wound localization, size, contour, and color assessment, and for objective and subjective symptoms. Response to treatment was graded as "complete remission" in case of full symptomatic relief and >75% decrease in lesion size, as "partial remission" in case of partial symptomatic relief and 25-75% decrease in lesion size, and as "stable disease" in case of no symptomatic relief or <25% decrease in lesion size. Patients were followed up monthly for the first 3 months and every 3 months thereafter by physical examination.

Results: A total dose of 37.5 Gy external RT in five fractions was prescribed by 6‑MeV electrons in 4 patients and 6‑MV photons in 2 patients. Complete response was obtained in all patients at the 6‑month control. All patients were satisfied with cosmetic results at their last control. Grade 2 dermatitis developed in all patients during the second week of RT but resolved completely in all after 6 months following the end of RT.

Conclusion: In keloids that are unresponsive to standard treatment, hypofractionated RT using a total dose of 37.5 Gy in five fractions is feasible.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source Listing
January 2021

Parotid gland stem cells: Mini yet mighty.

Head Neck 2021 Apr 27;43(4):1122-1127. Epub 2020 Nov 27.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Background: Our aim was to evaluate the correlation between the radiation doses to parotid gland (PG) stem cells and xerostomia.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer (HNC) were retrospectively evaluated, and xerostomia inventory (XI) was applied to these patients. PG stem cells were delineated on the treatment planning CT, and the mean doses to the PG stem cells calculated.

Results: The total test score and mean doses to bilateral PGs were significantly correlated (r = .34, P = .001), and the mean doses to bilateral PG stem cell niches were significantly correlated with the total test score (r = .32, P = .002).

Conclusions: In this study, we found that the mean dose to PG stem cells can predict dry mouth as much as the mean dose to the PG.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source Listing
April 2021

Determination of inflection points of CyberKnife dose profiles within acceptability criteria of deviations in measurements.

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020 Jan-Feb;25(1):6-12. Epub 2019 Nov 12.

Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the Inflection Points (IPs) of flattening filter free (FFF) CyberKnife dose profiles for cone-based streotactic radiotherapy. In addition, dosimetric field sizes were determined.

Background: The increased need for treatment in the early stages of cancer necessitated the treatment of smaller tumors. However, efforts in that direction required the modeling accuracy of the beam. Removal of the flattening filter (FF) from the path of x-ray beam has provided the solution to those efforts, but required a different normalization approach for the beam to ensure the delivery of the dose accurately. As a solution, researchers proposed a normalization factor based on IPs.

Materials And Methods: Measurements using microDiamond (PTW 60019), Diode SRS (PTW 60018) and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations of dose profiles were completed at SAD 80 cm and 5 cm depth for 15-60 mm cones. Performance analysis of detectors with respect to MC calculation was carried out. Gamma evaluation method was used to determine achievable acceptability criteria for FFF CyberKnife beams.

Results: Acceptability within (3%-0.5 mm) was found to be anachievable criterion for all dose profile measurements of the cone beams used in this study. To determine the IP, the first and second derivatives of the dose profile were determined via the cubic spline interpolation technique.

Conclusion: Derivatives of the interpolated profiles showed that locations of IPs and 50% isodose points coincide.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source Listing
November 2019

The dosimetric impact of implants on the spinal cord dose during stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Radiat Oncol 2016 May 25;11:71. Epub 2016 May 25.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Background: The effects of spinal implants on dose distribution have been studied for conformal treatment plans. However, the dosimetric impact of spinal implants in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatments has not been studied in spatial orientation. In this study we evaluated the effect of spinal implants placed in sawbone vertebra models implanted as in vivo instrumentations.

Methods: Four different spinal implant reconstruction techniques were performed using the standard sawbone lumbar vertebrae model; 1. L2-L4 posterior instrumentation without anterior column reconstruction (PI); 2. L2-L4 anterior instrumentation, L3 corpectomy, and anterior column reconstruction with a titanium cage (AIAC); 3. L2-L4 posterior instrumentation, L3 corpectomy, and anterior column reconstruction with a titanium cage (PIAC); 4. L2-L4 anterior instrumentation, L3 corpectomy, and anterior column reconstruction with chest tubes filled with bone cement (AIABc). The target was defined as the spinous process and lamina of the lumbar (L) 3 vertebra. A thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD, LiF:Mg,Ti) was located on the measurement point anterior to the spinal cord. The prescription dose was 8 Gy and the treatment was administered in a single fraction using a CyberKnife® (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). We performed two different treatment plans. In Plan A beam interaction with the rod was not limited. In plan B the rod was considered a structure of avoidance, and interaction between the rod and beam was prevented. TLD measurements were compared with the point dose calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS).

Results And Discussion: In plan A, the difference between TLD measurement and the dose calculated by the TPS was 1.7 %, 2.8 %, and 2.7 % for the sawbone with no implant, PI, and PIAC models, respectively. For the AIAC model the TLD dose was 13.8 % higher than the TPS dose; the difference was 18.6 % for the AIABc model. In plan B for the AIAC and AIABc models, TLD measurement was 2.5 % and 0.9 % higher than the dose calculated by the TPS, respectively.

Conclusions: Spinal implants may be present in the treatment field in patients scheduled to undergo SBRT. For the types of implants studied herein anterior rod instrumentation resulted in an increase in the spinal cord dose, whereas use of a titanium cage had a minimal effect on dose distribution. While planning SBRT in patients with spinal reconstructions, avoidance of the rod and preventing interaction between the rod and beam might be the optimal solution for preventing unexpectedly high spinal cord doses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source Listing
May 2016