Etta D Pisano

Etta D Pisano

UNVERIFIED PROFILE

Are you Etta D Pisano?   Register this Author

Register author
Etta D Pisano

Etta D Pisano

Publications by authors named "Etta D Pisano"

Are you Etta D Pisano?   Register this Author

100Publications

1286Reads

9Profile Views

Big Data and Radiology Research.

J Am Coll Radiol 2019 Sep;16(9 Pt B):1347-1350

American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.06.003DOI Listing
September 2019

Impact of prevalence and case distribution in lab-based diagnostic imaging studies.

J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2019 Jan 21;6(1):015501. Epub 2019 Jan 21.

FDA/CDRH/OSEL/Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/journal-of-medic
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.6.1.015501DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6340399PMC
January 2019

What Can Be Done to Improve Research Biopsy Quality in Oncology Clinical Trials?

J Oncol Pract 2018 Oct 4:JOP1800092. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Harvard Medical School; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; American College of Radiology, Reston, VA; and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JOP.18.00092
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JOP.18.00092DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6237512PMC
October 2018

Is Tomosynthesis the Future of Breast Cancer Screening?

Authors:
Etta D Pisano

Radiology 2018 04;287(1):47-48

From the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 76 Putnam Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018172953DOI Listing
April 2018

Tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.

Clin Imaging 2016 Mar-Apr;40(2):283-7. Epub 2015 Sep 24.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Radiology Department, 330 Brookline Avenue, Ansin 2, Boston, MA 02215. Electronic address:

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.09.014DOI Listing
November 2016

Reply to "Reducing Gender Discrepancies in Academic Radiology".

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016 11 4;207(5):W105. Epub 2016 Aug 4.

3 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, MA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.16836DOI Listing
November 2016

Dedicated Three-dimensional Breast Computed Tomography: Lesion Characteristic Perception by Radiologists.

J Clin Imaging Sci 2016 30;6:14. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.179428DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4860456PMC
May 2016

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Functional Tumor Volume by MR Imaging Predicts Recurrence-free Survival-Results from the ACRIN 6657/CALGB 150007 I-SPY 1 TRIAL.

Radiology 2016 Apr 1;279(1):44-55. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

From the Departments of Radiology (N.M.H., D.C.N.) and Surgery (L.J.E.), University of California, San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero St, Room C250, Box 1667, San Francisco, CA 94115; Department of Biostatistics (C.A.G.) and Center for Statistical Sciences (C.A.G., H.S.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN), Philadelphia, Pa (C.A.G., H.S.M., M.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.A.R., M.D.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (C.D.L., S.C.P.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Ala (W.K.B.); Department of Radiology, Medical College of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (E.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (E.A.M.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (P.T.W.); Department of Radiology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC (S.M.P.); and Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (G.M.N.).

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015150013DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819899PMC
April 2016

Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666.

J Natl Cancer Inst 2016 Apr 28;108(4). Epub 2015 Dec 28.

Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC (WAB) and Department of Biostatistics (AIB), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (EBM); CERIM, Buenos Aires, Argentina (DL); Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (RAJ); Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (EDP).

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv367DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5943835PMC
April 2016

Men (and Women) in Academic Radiology: How Can We Reduce the Gender Discrepancy?

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016 Apr 2;206(4):678-80. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

1 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.15277DOI Listing
April 2016

Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy among Women Screened in the Ontario Breast Screening Program--Evidence that Direct Radiography Is Superior to Computed Radiography for Cancer Detection.

Authors:
Etta D Pisano

Radiology 2016 Feb;278(2):311-2

From the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015152344DOI Listing
February 2016

Impact of computer-aided detection systems on radiologist accuracy with digital mammography.

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014 Oct;203(4):909-16

1 Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas St, Ste 210, MSC 323, Charleston, SC 29425.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1046/1/1046.pdf
Web Search
http://www.ajronline.org/doi/abs/10.2214/AJR.12.10187
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.10187DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4286296PMC
October 2014

Breast cancer screening: should tomosynthesis replace digital mammography?

JAMA 2014 Jun;311(24):2488-9

University of Toronto, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.6421DOI Listing
June 2014

Conflict of interest policies for academic health system leaders who work with outside corporations.

JAMA 2014 Mar;311(11):1111-2

Union Graduate College, Schenectady, New York.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.788DOI Listing
March 2014

Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammography.

Acad Radiol 2012 Aug 24;19(8):916-22. Epub 2012 Apr 24.

Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, 29425, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2012.03.005DOI Listing
August 2012

Diffraction enhanced imaging of a rat model of gastric acid aspiration pneumonitis.

Acad Radiol 2011 Dec 29;18(12):1515-21. Epub 2011 Sep 29.

Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2011.08.005DOI Listing
December 2011

Mode of detection and secular time for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:
Etta D Pisano

J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010 ;2010(41):142-4

Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina College of Medicine, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Suite 601, MSC 617. Charleston, SC 29425, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
https://academic.oup.com/jncimono/article-lookup/doi/10.1093
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq028DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5161066PMC
February 2011

Comparison of image acquisition and radiologist interpretation times in a diagnostic mammography center.

Acad Radiol 2010 Sep 19;17(9):1168-74. Epub 2010 Jun 19.

Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2010.04.018DOI Listing
September 2010

Optimal multidetector row CT parameters for evaluations of the breast: a phantom and specimen study.

Acad Radiol 2010 Jun;17(6):744-51

Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 516 Gojan-1-dong, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, Ansan, Korea.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2010.02.008DOI Listing
June 2010

Recommendations for research priorities in breast cancer by the coalition of cancer cooperative groups scientific leadership council: imaging and local therapy.

Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010 Apr 19;120(2):273-84. Epub 2009 Dec 19.

Montefiore Medical Center - Weiler Division, Professor of Medicine and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1825 Eastchester Road, 10461, Bronx, NY, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0655-zDOI Listing
April 2010

Detection of arterial calcification in mammograms by random walks.

Inf Process Med Imaging 2009 ;21:713-24

Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 106 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
September 2009

Design and implementation of a compact low-dose diffraction enhanced medical imaging system.

Acad Radiol 2009 Aug 17;16(8):911-7. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7000, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2009.02.007DOI Listing
August 2009

Mammographic findings of partial breast irradiation.

Acad Radiol 2009 Jul 17;16(7):819-25. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2009.01.021DOI Listing
July 2009

Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammography.

Radiology 2009 Apr;251(1):41-9

Carl J. Vyborny Translation Laboratory for Breast Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC-2026, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511071462DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2663585PMC
April 2009

Premedical education.

Authors:
Etta D Pisano

Acad Med 2008 Dec;83(12):1122; author reply 1122

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31818c73f6DOI Listing
December 2008

Research for North Carolina: The University Cancer Research Fund.

N C Med J 2008 Jul-Aug;69(4):299-302

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
November 2008

Insurance status and the severity of breast cancer at the time of diagnosis.

Acad Radiol 2008 Oct;15(10):1255-8

Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB# 5120 Manning Dr., Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2008.04.011DOI Listing
October 2008

A limitation of ACRIN DMIST.

Radiology 2008 Aug;248(2):702; author reply 702-3

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2482080235DOI Listing
August 2008

Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening.

Ann Intern Med 2008 Jan;148(1):1-10

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2662630PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-1-200801010-00002DOI Listing
January 2008

Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography.

Radiol Clin North Am 2007 Sep;45(5):813-30, vi

Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB 7000, Room 4030 Bondurant Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2007.06.007DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2078259PMC
September 2007

Two-modality mammography may confer an advantage over either full-field digital mammography or screen-film mammography.

Acad Radiol 2007 Jun;14(6):670-6

Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2007.02.011DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1975808PMC
June 2007

Factors affecting decreasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina after 2002: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.

Acad Radiol 2007 Jun;14(6):685-91

Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2007.02.012DOI Listing
June 2007

Comparison of three methods to increase knowledge about breast cancer and breast cancer screening in screening mammography patients.

Acad Radiol 2007 May;14(5):553-60

Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB# 7510, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S107663320700019
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2007.01.011DOI Listing
May 2007

Choosing a specialty in medicine: female medical students and radiology.

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007 Apr;188(4):897-900

Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Dr., Campus Box 7510, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0539DOI Listing
April 2007

A comparative study of mobile electronic data entry systems for clinical trials data collection.

Int J Med Inform 2006 Oct-Nov;75(10-11):722-9. Epub 2005 Dec 28.

University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, CB#7515, Radiology Research Labs, 106 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S138650560500211
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.10.007DOI Listing
February 2007

Correlation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomas.

Acad Radiol 2006 Oct;13(10):1211-8

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Korea University, 516 Kozan 1-dong, Danwon-gu, Ansan, Kyungki-do 425-707, Korea.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2006.06.015DOI Listing
October 2006

Digital mammography: what next?

Authors:
Etta D Pisano

J Am Coll Radiol 2006 Aug;3(8):583-5

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Radiology, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S154614400600211
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2006.04.007DOI Listing
August 2006

Image quality in digital mammography: image acquisition.

J Am Coll Radiol 2006 Aug;3(8):589-608

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908-1339, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2006.04.004DOI Listing
August 2006

Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography.

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 Jul;187(1):47-50

Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, 388-1, Seoul 138-736, South Korea.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0187DOI Listing
July 2006

Low-dose multidetector dynamic CT in the breast: preliminary study.

Clin Imaging 2005 May-Jun;29(3):172-8

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Konkuk University Hospital, #1 Whayang-dong, KwangJin-gu, Seoul 143-914, South Korea.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2004.04.029DOI Listing
March 2006

Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I.

Med Phys 2006 Mar;33(3):719-36

Imaging Research Program, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1118/1.2163407
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2163407DOI Listing
March 2006

Quality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial.

Med Phys 2006 Mar;33(3):737-52

Imaging Research Program, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2164067DOI Listing
March 2006

Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

N Engl J Med 2005 Oct 16;353(17):1773-83. Epub 2005 Sep 16.

Department of Radiology, the Biomedical Research Imaging Center, and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa052911DOI Listing
October 2005

Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.

Med Phys 2005 Oct;32(10):3144-50

Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Old Infirmary Builiding, Room 513, CB#7510, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2040710DOI Listing
October 2005

A comparative study of 2D and 3D ultrasonography for evaluation of solid breast masses.

Eur J Radiol 2005 Jun;54(3):365-70

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Korea University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.07.006DOI Listing
June 2005

The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance.

Acad Radiol 2005 May;12(5):585-95

Department of Radiology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, CB#7515, Radiology Research Labs, 106 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2005.01.017DOI Listing
May 2005

Future directions in breast imaging.

J Clin Oncol 2005 Mar;23(8):1674-7

Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/23/8/1674.full.pdf
Web Search
http://www.jco.org/cgi/doi/10.1200/JCO.2005.11.039
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.11.039DOI Listing
March 2005

Digital mammography.

Radiology 2005 Feb;234(2):353-62

Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering and UNC-Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, 515 Old Infirmary, CB 7510, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2342030897DOI Listing
February 2005

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and management of breast cancer.

Technol Cancer Res Treat 2004 Dec;3(6):527-41

Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Medical School, CB 7510, 101 Manning Dr., Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/153303460400300602DOI Listing
December 2004

Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population.

Acad Radiol 2004 Aug;11(8):879-86

Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 106 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2004.04.003DOI Listing
August 2004

Improved image contrast of calcifications in breast tissue specimens using diffraction enhanced imaging.

Phys Med Biol 2004 Aug;49(15):3427-39

Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/15/008DOI Listing
August 2004

Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.

Acad Radiol 2004 May;11(5):536-43

Department of Radiology and Biostatistics, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB# 7510 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S107663320400049
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2004.01.003DOI Listing
May 2004

Online annotation tool for digital mammography.

Acad Radiol 2004 May;11(5):566-72

Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB#7515, RRL/MRI Building, 106 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27759, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00726-8DOI Listing
May 2004

Does biopsy, aspiration or six-month follow-up of a false-positive mammogram reduce future screening or have large psychosocial effects?

Acad Radiol 2003 Nov;10(11):1257-66

Department of Radiology, Radiology Research Lab, CB # 7515, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00382-9DOI Listing
November 2003

Factors predicting successful needle-localized breast biopsy.

Acad Radiol 2003 Jun;10(6):601-6

Department of Epidemiology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80077-6DOI Listing
June 2003

Pregnancy- and lactation-associated breast cancer: mammographic and sonographic findings.

J Ultrasound Med 2003 May;22(5):491-7; quiz 498-9

Department of Radiology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.7863/jum.2003.22.5.491DOI Listing
May 2003

Ultrasound in the management of breast disease.

Curr Womens Health Rep 2003 Apr;3(2):156-64

Breast Imaging Section, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
April 2003

Prevention and early detection clinical trials: opportunities for primary care providers and their patients.

CA Cancer J Clin 2003 Mar-Apr;53(2):82-101

Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.53.2.82DOI Listing
April 2003

Should FDG PET be used to decide whether a patient with an abnormal mammogram or breast finding at physical examination should undergo biopsy?

Acad Radiol 2002 Jul;9(7):773-83

Technology Evaluation Center, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Washington, DC 20005, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80347-1DOI Listing
July 2002

Congressional update: Report from the Biomedical Imaging Program of the National Cancer Institute. American College of Radiology Imaging Network: The digital mammographic imaging screening trial--an update.

Acad Radiol 2002 Mar;9(3):374-5

Biomedical Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20892-7440, USA.

View Article

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80382-3DOI Listing
March 2002