Publications by authors named "Ecushla C Linedale"

5 Publications

  • Page 1 of 1

The Potential of Integrated Nurse-Led Models to Improve Care for People With Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Gastroenterol Nurs 2020 Jan/Feb;43(1):53-64

Ecushla C. Linedale, PhD, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia; and The South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Functional gastrointestinal disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia are extremely common, debilitating, and costly. Although diagnostic guidelines and effective management options exist, management is suboptimal, with long waiting lists, delayed diagnosis, and poor patient outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to explore and evaluate evidence for existing models of care for functional gastrointestinal disorders. Thirty-eight studies pertaining to the diagnosis or management of functional gastrointestinal disorders were found; however, only 6 investigated a full model of care. Five studies assessed a nurse-led model and 1 a structured gastroenterologist consultation. Nurse-led models were cheaper to current treatments and resulted in symptomatic improvement, high patient satisfaction, reduced healthcare usage, and improved psychosocial functioning and quality of life, whereas standard gastroenterological care did not alleviate pain or improve quality of life. There is minimal research trialing integrated models of care for the diagnosis and management of functional gastrointestinal disorders. This represents a lost opportunity for timely and effective healthcare provision to a large patient group. Although low in quality, preliminary data suggest that integrated nurse-led models of care are economically viable and may facilitate timely diagnosis and management and improve patient outcomes. Furthermore, studies to robustly evaluate the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of such models are needed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SGA.0000000000000379DOI Listing
December 2020

Faecal calprotectin testing for identifying patients with organic gastrointestinal disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Med J Aust 2019 11 3;211(10):461-467. Epub 2019 Nov 3.

Mater Hospital Brisbane, Brisbane, QLD.

Objectives: To assess the clinical effectiveness of faecal calprotectin (FC) testing for distinguishing between organic gastrointestinal diseases (organic GID), such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and functional gastrointestinal disorders (functional GIDs).

Study Design: Studies that assessed the accuracy of FC testing for differentiating between IBD or organic GID and functional GIDs were reviewed. Articles published in English during January 1998 - June 2018 that compared diagnostic FC testing in primary care and outpatient hospital settings with a reference test and employed the standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent FC assay method with a cut-off of 50 or 100 μg/g faeces were included. Study quality was assessed with QUADAS-2, an evidence-based quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies.

Data Sources: MEDLINE and EMBASE; reference lists of screened articles.

Data Synthesis: Eighteen relevant studies were identified. For distinguishing patients with organic GID (including IBD) from those with functional GIDs (16 studies), the estimated sensitivity of FC testing was 81% (95% CI, 74-86%), the specificity 81% (95% CI, 71-88%); area under the curve (AUC) was 0.87. For distinguishing IBD from functional GIDs (ten studies), sensitivity was 88% (95% CI, 80-93%), specificity 72% (95% CI, 59-82%), and AUC 0.89. Assuming a population prevalence of organic GID of 1%, the positive predictive value was 4.2%, the negative predictive value 100%. The difference in sensitivity and specificity between FC testing cut-offs of 50 μg/g and 100 μg/g faeces was not statistically significant (P = 0.77).

Conclusions: FC testing is clinically useful for distinguishing organic GID (including IBD) from functional GIDs, and its incorporation into clinical practice for evaluating patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms could lead to fewer patients with functional GIDs undergoing colonoscopy, reducing costs for both patients and the health system.

Prospero Registration: CRD4201810507.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50384DOI Listing
November 2019

Referrals to a tertiary hospital: A window into clinical management issues in functional gastrointestinal disorders.

JGH Open 2017 Nov 31;1(3):84-91. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

Department of Medicine, The University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia.

Background And Aim: To investigate the quality of and reasons for referrals of patients with likely functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) and explore patients' experience of clinical management.

Methods: A cross sectional, mixed-methods study was undertaken. Referrals (July 2013-2015) to one gastroenterology outpatient department triaged as "likely FGID", the referred patients and their referring primary healthcare providers were examined.

Results: A total of 69% of patients reported not yet receiving an initial diagnosis, 52% reported persistent/distressing symptoms or reduced quality of life, 24% feared missed or worsening pathology, and 35% were seeking repeat specialist consultation. Most patients were dissatisfied (40%) or only partially satisfied (36%) with current management. Dissatisfaction was significantly related to the lack of provision of a diagnosis and effective treatment options ( < 0.001). Referral quality was poor and with the reason for referral clearly communicated in only 25%. Common referral reasons included repeat presentations ( = 32), diagnostic uncertainty ( = 19), to ensure nothing is missed ( = 19), patient request ( = 17), no response to treatment ( = 16), and to allay patient fears ( = 14). A total of 28/60 primary healthcare providers were confident that their patient had a FGID, yet sought confirmation ( = 16), second opinion ( = 8), or advice ( = 4).

Conclusion: Current management of FGID in usual care is suboptimal, as evidenced by the tertiary referral load, patient dissatisfaction, and the lack of provision of diagnoses and effective treatment options. Some clinicians lack confidence in effectively identifying and managing these conditions. Resources and supports to equip and assist clinicians to identify and manage FGID successfully may enhance patient care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12015DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207011PMC
November 2017

Diagnosis and management of irritable bowel syndrome: a guide for the generalist.

Med J Aust 2017 Sep;207(7):309-315

Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and other functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are so prevalent they cannot reasonably have their diagnoses and management based within specialty care. However, delayed diagnosis, lengthy wait times for specialist review, overinvestigation and lack of clear diagnostic communication are common. The intrusive symptoms of IBS and other FGIDs impair patient functioning and reduce quality of life, and come with significant costs to individual patients and the health care system, which could be reduced with timely diagnosis and effective management. IBS, in particular, is no longer a diagnosis of exclusion, and there are now effective dietary and psychological therapies that may be accessed without specialist referral. The faecal calprotectin test is widely available, yet not on the Medical Benefits Schedule, and a normal test result reliably discriminates between people with IBS and patients who warrant specialist referral.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5694/mja17.00457DOI Listing
September 2017

Uncertain Diagnostic Language Affects Further Studies, Endoscopies, and Repeat Consultations for Patients With Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016 12 9;14(12):1735-1741.e1. Epub 2016 Jul 9.

University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Background & Aims: Although guidelines state that functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) can be diagnosed with minimal investigation, consultations and investigations still have high costs. We investigated whether these are due to specific behaviors of specialist clinicians by examining differences in clinician approaches to organic gastrointestinal diseases vs FGIDs.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 207 outpatient department letters written from the gastroenterology unit at a tertiary hospital after patient consultations from 2008 through 2011. We collected data from diagnostic letters and case notes relating to patients with organic (n = 108) or functional GI disorders (n = 119). We analyzed the content of each letter by using content analysis and reviewed case files to determine which investigations were subsequently performed. Our primary outcome was the type of diagnostic language used and other aspects of the clinical approach.

Results: We found gastroenterologists to use 2 distinct types of language, clear vs qualified, which was consistent with their level of certainty (or lack thereof), for example, "the patient is diagnosed with…." vs "it is possible that this patient might have….". Qualified diagnostic language was used in a significantly higher proportion of letters about patients with FGIDs (63%) than organic gastrointestinal diseases (13%) (P < .001). In addition, a higher proportion of patients with FGIDs underwent endoscopic evaluation than patients with organic gastrointestinal diseases (79% vs 63%; P < .05).

Conclusions: In an analysis of diagnoses of patients with FGIDs vs organic disorders, we found that gastroenterologists used more qualified (uncertain) language in diagnosing patients with FGIDs. This may contribute to patient discard of diagnoses and lead to additional, unwarranted endoscopic investigations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.06.030DOI Listing
December 2016