Publications by authors named "Corey K Ho"

2 Publications

  • Page 1 of 1

The Everted Acetabular Labrum: Patho-anatomy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopic Findings of a Native Variant.

Arthroscopy 2021 May 4. Epub 2021 May 4.

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics, Aurora, Colorado, U.S.A.. Electronic address:

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to introduce a native labral variant, the everted acetabular labrum, and to describe the patho-anatomy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRI/MRA) characteristics and the arthroscopic findings in this condition.

Methods: All primary hip arthroscopy procedures performed by the senior author between June 2013 and January 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. An everted acetabular labrum was identified as a segment of labrum that lacked apposition to the femoral head with the hip off traction. All everted labra were treated with labral advancement and repair with or without augmentation or reconstruction. The labrum-to-femoral head distance was measured in 3T MRI/MRA at the 1-2 o'clock position. A random selection of 38 hips without an everted labrum served as controls to compare radiographic parameters.

Results: A total of 68 hips were identified as having an everted labrum during the study period (mean age, 29.1 years), and 55 hips had advanced imaging available for review. MRI/MRA scans revealed the everted labrum to have a triangular shape in 17 hips (31%) and a blunted/round shape in 38 hips (69%), which differed significantly from controls (triangular 25/38 [66%], blunted 13/38 [34%], P < 0.001). The average labrum-to-femoral head distance was 1.4 mm for everted labra versus 0.0 mm for controls (P < 0.0001) and the mean labral lengths and widths were significantly shorter than those of controls (both P < 0.01). Of the hips, 8 underwent labral reconstruction or augmentation, and 61 underwent labral advancement/repair.

Conclusion: The everted acetabular labrum is a native variant that is identifiable during hip arthroscopy by assessing the labral seal off traction. Preoperative MRI/MRA findings can be highly predictive of an everted labrum. Surgical treatment includes labral advancement and repair or reconstruction to restore contact between the labrum and the femoral head.

Level Of Evidence: III, retrospective comparative study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source Listing
May 2021

Minding the Gap in Vertebroplasty: Vertebral Body Fracture Clefts and Cement Nonunion.

Pain Physician 2021 Mar;24(2):E221-E230

Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

Background: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are leading treatments for patients with vertebral body compression fractures. Although cement augmentation has been shown to help relieve pain and instability from fractures containing a cleft, there is some controversy in the literature regarding the procedure's efficacy in these cases. Additionally, some of the literature blurs the distinction between clefts and cement patterns (including cement nonunion and cement fill pattern). Both clefts and cement patterns have been mentioned in the literature as risks for poorer outcomes following cement augmentation, which can result in complications such as cement migration.

Objectives: This study aims to identify the prevalence of fracture clefts and cement nonunion, the relationship between them as well as to cement fill pattern, and their association with demographics and other variables related to technique and outcomes.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Interventional radiology department at a single site university hospital.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study assessed 295 vertebroplasties/kyphoplasties performed at the University of Colorado Hospital from 2008 to 2018. Vertebral fracture cleft and cement nonunion were the main variables of interest. Presence and characterization of a fracture cleft was determined on pre-procedural imaging, defined as an air or fluid filled cavity within the fractured vertebral body on magnetic resonance or computed tomography. Cement nonunion was evaluated on post-procedural imaging, defined as air or fluid surrounding the cement bolus on magnetic resonance or computed tomography or imaging evidence of cement migration. Cement fill pattern was assessed on procedural and/or post-procedural imaging. Pain improvement scores were based on a visual analog score immediately prior to the procedure and during clinical visits in the short-term follow-up period. Additional patient demographics, medical history, and procedure details were obtained from electronic medical chart review.

Results: Pre-procedural vertebral fracture clefts were demonstrated in 29.8% of our cases. Increasing age, secondary osteoporosis, and thoracolumbar junction location were associated with increased odds of clefts. There was no significant difference in pain improvement outcomes in patients following cement augmentation between clefted and non-clefted compression fractures. Clefts, especially large clefts, and cleft-only fill pattern were associated with increased odds of cement nonunion. Procedure techniques (vertebroplasty, curette, and balloon kyphoplasty) demonstrated similar proportion of cement nonunion and distribution of cement fill pattern.

Limitations: Cement nonunion was observed in only 6.8% of cases. Due to this low proportion, statistical inference tends to have low power. Multiple levels were treated in nearly half of the study's patients undergoing a single vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty session; in these cases, each level was treated as independent rather than spatially correlated within the same study patient.

Conclusions: Vertebral body fracture clefts are not uncommon and are related to (but distinct from) cement nonunion and cement fill patterns. Our study shows that, although patients with clefts will benefit from cement augmentation just as much as patients without a cleft, the performing provider should take note of cement fill and take extra steps to ensure optimal cement fill. These providers should also identify cement nonunion and associated complications (such as cement migration) on follow-up imaging.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

March 2021