Publications by authors named "Cody R van Rassel"

2 Publications

  • Page 1 of 1

Concurrent Validity of a Stationary Cycling Test and Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test in Adults with Concussion.

J Athl Train 2021 Apr 22. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

1Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Context: Following concussion, a multi-faceted assessment is recommended, including tests of physical exertion. The current gold standard for exercise testing following concussion is the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT); however, there is a lack of validated tests that utilize alternative exercise modalities.

Objective: To assess the feasibility and concurrent validity of a novel cycling test of exertion compared to the BCTT.

Design: Crossover Study Setting: University Sport-Medicine Clinic Patients: Twenty adults (aged 18-60 years) diagnosed with a Sport-Related Concussion Intervention: Participants completed the BCTT and a cycling test of exertion in a random order, approximately 48 hours apart.

Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome of interest was maximum heart rate [HRmax; beats per minute (bpm)]. Secondary outcomes of interest included whether the participant reached volitional fatigue (yes/no), symptom responsible for test cessation (Post Concussion Symptom Scale), and Symptom Severity on a Visual Scale (/10).

Results: Of the 20 participants, 19 (10 male, 9 female) completed both tests. One participant did not return for the second test and was excluded from the analysis. No adverse events were reported. The median HRmax for the BCTT [171 bpm; (IQR: 139-184bpm)] was not significantly different than the median HRmax for the Cycle [173 bpm; (IQR: 160-182)] (z=-0.63, p=0.53). For both tests, the three most frequently reported symptoms responsible for test cessation were Headache, Dizziness, and Pressure in the head. Of interest, the majority of participants (64%) reported a different symptom responsible for test cessation on each test.

Conclusion: The novel cycling test of exertion achieved similar HRmax and test duration and may be a suitable alternative to the BCTT. Future research to understand the physiological reason for the heterogeneity in symptoms responsible for test cessation is warranted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0003.21DOI Listing
April 2021

Validity of electrical impedance myography to estimate percent body fat: comparison to bio-electrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2019 Apr 18;59(4):632-639. Epub 2018 Jul 18.

PERFORM Center, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada -

Background: Assessment of percent body fat (%BF) is typically measured with bioelectrical impedance (BIA) as a proxy for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Notably, poorer agreement between BIA and DXA among persons who are overweight or obese has been reported. The use of electrical impedance myography (EIM) as a proxy for DXA has not been validated. The objective was to evaluate an EIM device and two multi-frequency BIA devices with the reference standard (DXA) stratified by weight status and gender.

Methods: In a convenience sample of 82 adults, %BF assessed by EIM and two BIA devices was compared to DXA. Agreement between devices was tested with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots.

Results: Agreement between DXA and EIM (ICC=0.77) was poorer than the agreement between either BIA device with DXA (ICC>0.87). Stratified by sex, agreement between EIM and DXA was greater for men than women (ICC=0.81 and ICC=0.61, respectively). Stratified by BMI, agreement between EIM and DXA was best for normal-weight individuals (ICC=0.89) and progressively poorer for overweight (ICC=0.80) and obese (ICC=0.67) individuals. Bland-Altman plots revealed wide limits of agreement and an increase in EIM mean difference as average %BF increased. Similar trends were seen in BIA assessments.

Conclusions: EIM and BIA substantially underestimate %BF in overweight and obese individuals. Wide limits of agreement coupled with variable ICC limit device interchangeability with one another and limit clinical utility.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08505-5DOI Listing
April 2019