Publications by authors named "Benoit Plourde"

10 Publications

  • Page 1 of 1

Twiddler Syndrome without Lead Dislodgment Discovered by Remote Monitoring.

Case Rep Cardiol 2021 6;2021:8816524. Epub 2021 Feb 6.

Department of Cardiology, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.

Twiddler syndrome is an uncommon yet dangerous phenomenon usually resulting in lead displacement with loss of capture of cardiac implantable electronic devices. In this case report, we present an interesting case of Twiddler syndrome without lead dislodgment which was detected by an alert triggered by an increase in impedance on remote monitoring.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8816524DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884166PMC
February 2021

Ventricular Arrhythmia in Septal and Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: The French-Canadian Experience.

Front Cardiovasc Med 2020 22;7:548564. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

Division of Cardiology, Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Department, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ-UL), Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.

Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (aHCM) is thought to have a more benign clinical course compared to septal HCM (sHCM), but most data have been derived from Asian cohorts. Comparative data on clinical outcome in Caucasian aHCM cohorts are scarce, and the results are conflicting. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence and outcome of aHCM in French-Canadians of Caucasian descent. We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study. The primary endpoint was a composite of documented sustained ventricular arrhythmia (VA), appropriate ICD therapy, arrhythmogenic syncope, cardiac arrest, or all-cause mortality. A total of 301 HCM patients (65% males) were enrolled including 80/301 (27%) with aHCM and 221/301 (73%) with sHCM. Maximal wall thickness was similar in both groups. Left ventricular apical aneurysm was significantly more common in aHCM (10 vs. 0.5%; < 0.001). The proportion of patients with myocardial fibrosis ≥ 15% of the left ventricular mass was similar between aHCM and sHCM (21 vs. 24%; = 0.68). Secondary prevention ICDs were more often implanted in aHCM patients (16 vs. 7%; = 0.02). The primary endpoint occurred in 26% of aHCM and 10.4% of sHCM patients ( = 0.001) and was driven by an increased incidence of sustained VA (10 vs. 2.3%; = 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified apical aneurysm and a phenotype of aHCM as independent predictors of the primary endpoint and the occurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia. Unexplained syncope and a family history of sudden cardiac death were additional predictors for sustained VA. Apical HCM was associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia even when excluding patients with apical aneurysm. The phenotype of apical HCM is much more common in French-Canadians (27%) of Caucasian descent compared to other Caucasian HCM populations. Apical HCM in French-Canadians is associated with an increased risk for ventricular arrhythmia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.548564DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642600PMC
October 2020

Findings of remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2020 11 26;43(11):1366-1372. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Background: Monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices was highly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic considering the high volume of in-person visits for regular follow-up. Recent recommendations highlight the important role of remote monitoring to prevent exposure to the virus. This study compared remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in patients whose in-person annual visit was substituted for a remote monitoring session with patients who were already scheduled for a remote monitoring session.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study of 329 consecutive patients between 20 March and 24 April 2020. Group 1 included 131 patients whose in-person annual visit was substituted for a remote monitoring session. Group 2 included 198 patients who underwent a remote monitoring session as scheduled in their usual device follow-up. The time interval since the last in-person visit was 13.3 ± 3.2 months in group 1 and 5.9 ± 1.7 months in group 2 (P < .01).

Results: In group 1, 15 patients (11.5%) experienced a clinical event compared to 15 patients (7.6%) in group 2 (P = .25). Nineteen patients (14.5%) required a physician intervention in group 1 compared to 19 patients (9.6%) in group 2 (P = .22). Two patients (1.5%) in group 1 and four patients (2.0%) in group 2 required an early in-person follow-up visit during the pandemic (P > .99).

Conclusion: Remote monitoring of ICDs is useful to identify clinical events and allows physicians to treat patients appropriately during the COVID-19 pandemic regardless of the time interval since their last in-person visit. It reduces significantly in-person visit for regular follow-up.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14086DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7675613PMC
November 2020

Driving Restrictions and Early Arrhythmias in Patients Receiving a Primary-Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (DREAM-ICD) Study.

Can J Cardiol 2020 Aug 28;36(8):1269-1277. Epub 2020 May 28.

Heart Rhythm Services, Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address:

Background: Current guidelines recommend 4 weeks of private driving restriction after implantation of a primary-prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). These driving restrictions result in significant inconvenience and social implications. Advances in medical treatment and ICD programming have lowered the overall rate of device therapies. The objective of this study was to assess the incidence of ICD therapies at 30, 60, and 180 days after implantation.

Methods: Driving Restrictions and Early Arrhythmias in Patients Receiving a Primary-Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (DREAM-ICD) was a retrospective cohort study conducted at 2 Canadian university centres enrolling patients with new implantation of a primary-prevention ICD. Device programming was standardised according to current guidelines. A total of 803 patients were enrolled.

Results: The cumulative rates of appropriate ICD therapies at 30, 60, and 180 days were 0.12%, 0.50%, and 0.75%, respectively. There was no syncope during the first 6 months. The median duration to the first appropriate ICD therapy was 208 (range 23-1109) days after implantation. The rate of inappropriate ICD therapies at 30 days was only 0.2%. Overall, < 13.6% of all appropriate ICD therapies occurred within the first 6 months after implantation.

Conclusions: The rate of appropriate ICD therapies within the first 30 days after device insertion is extremely low in contemporary primary prevention cohorts with guideline-concordant device programming. There was no increased risk for ventricular arrhythmia early after ICD insertion. The results of DREAM-ICD suggest the need for a revision of the existing driving restrictions for primary-prevention ICD recipients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2020.05.029DOI Listing
August 2020

A Novel Wearable Device for Continuous Ambulatory ECG Recording: Proof of Concept and Assessment of Signal Quality.

Biosensors (Basel) 2019 Jan 21;9(1). Epub 2019 Jan 21.

Electrophysiology Division, Institut Universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, G1V 4G5, QC, Canada.

Diagnosis of arrhythmic disorders is challenging because of their short-lasting, intermittent character. Conventional technologies of noninvasive ambulatory rhythm monitoring are limited by modest sensitivity. We present a novel form of wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) sensors providing an alternative tool for long-term rhythm monitoring with the potential of increased sensitivity to detect intermittent or subclinical arrhythmia. The objective was to assess the signal quality and R-R coverage of a wearable ECG sensor system compared to a standard 3-lead Holter. In this phase-1 trial, healthy individuals underwent 24-h simultaneous rhythm monitoring using the OMsignal system together with a 3-lead Holter recording. The OMsignal system consists of a garment (bra or shirt) with integrated sensors recording a single-lead ECG and an acquisition module for data storage and processing. Head-to-head signal quality was assessed regarding adequate P-QRS-T distinction and was performed by three electrophysiologists blinded to the recording technology. The accuracy of signal coverage was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. Fifteen individuals underwent simultaneous 24-h recording. Signal quality and accuracy of the OMgaments was equivalent to Holter-monitoring (84% vs 93% electrophysiologists rating, = 0.06). Signal coverage of R-R intervals showed a very close overlay between the OMsignal system and Holter signals, mean difference in heart rate of 2 5 bpm. The noise level of OMgarments was comparable to Holter recording. OMgarments provide high signal quality for adequate rhythm analysis, representing a promising novel technology for long-term non-invasive ECG monitoring.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios9010017DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6468449PMC
January 2019

Validation of a novel single lead ambulatory ECG monitor - Cardiostat™ - Compared to a standard ECG Holter monitoring.

J Electrocardiol 2019 Mar - Apr;53:57-63. Epub 2018 Dec 19.

IUCPQ - Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Canada.

Background: Cardiostat™ is a single lead ambulatory ECG monitor. Recording is made through 2 electrodes positioned in a lead 1-like configuration. We first validated its accuracy for atrial fibrillation detection compared to a 12-lead ECG. In the second phase of the study, arrhythmia detection accuracy was compared between Cardiostat™ ambulatory ECG and a standard 24 h Holter ECG monitoring.

Method/results: Phase one of the study included patients undergoing cardioversion for atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter. Cardiostat™ tracings were compared with standard 12-lead ECG. In the second phase, patients undergoing 24 h ambulatory Holter ECG monitoring for control or suspicion of atrial fibrillation (AF) were included. Simultaneous Holter monitoring and Cardiostat™ ECG recordings were performed. Tracings were analysed and compared. Two hundred twelve monitoring were compared. AF was diagnosed in 73 patients. Agreement between Cardiostat™ ECG and standard Holter monitoring was 99% for AF detection with kappa = 0.99. Kappa correlation for atrial flutter detection was only moderate at 0.51. AF burden was similar in both recordings. Noise hindered analysis in a greater proportion with Cardiostat™ compared to Holter ambulatory ECG (8.5 vs 3.8%).

Conclusion: Cardiostat™ ambulatory ECG device showed excellent correlation with the standard Holter ECG monitoring for AF detection. Holter monitoring was however superior to discriminate premature atrial and ventricular beats and to qualify the morphology of PVCs since it has more vectors for analysis. Added value of Cardiostat™ includes longer monitoring duration, less cumbersome installation and water resistance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.12.011DOI Listing
July 2020

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection: Detailed Analysis of Cost Implications.

Can J Cardiol 2018 08 7;34(8):1026-1032. Epub 2018 May 7.

Electrophysiology Division, Institut Universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Canada. Electronic address:

Background: Infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite many preventive measures, this condition is associated with significant costs for the health care system.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all infection cases referred for lead extraction at a single university hospital over 1 year (2015-2016). We then calculated all costs related to the infection episode per patient using hospital databases and charts review.

Results: Thirty-eight patients with CIED infections (29% women-mean age 71 ± 14 years) were referred for lead extraction (27 pocket infections, 11 endocarditis). Devices were mainly pacemakers (60%). When the pathogen was identified, Staphylococcus aureus methicillin sensitive was the main cause. Extraction was performed in all but 3 cases (92%). One death occurred in the nonextracted group. Respective durations of hospitalization and intravenous and antibiotic administration for patients undergoing extraction were 21 and 36 days. The calculated mean total cost for CIED infection management was CAD$29,907 (median: 26,879; range: CAD$4,827-$62,585). Mean hospital charges were CAD$12,291, accounting for 41% of the total costs.

Conclusions: This study represents the first analysis of the direct costs associated with lead extraction in Canada. Device infections are associated with significant costs and increased morbidity. Any preventive measure will have a significant impact on the economic burden of the health care system and patient outcome after lead extraction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2018.05.001DOI Listing
August 2018

Sudden cardiac death and obesity.

Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2014 Sep;12(9):1099-110

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

For individuals and the society as a whole, the increased risk of sudden cardiac death in obese patients is becoming a major challenge, especially since obesity prevalence has been increasing steadily around the globe. Traditional risk factors and obesity often coexist. Hypertension, diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea and metabolic syndrome are well-known risk factors for CV disease and are often present in the obese patient. Although the bulk of evidence is circumstantial, sudden cardiac death and obesity share common traditional CV risk factors. Structural, functional and metabolic factors modulate and influence the risk of sudden cardiac death in the obese population. Other risk factors such as left ventricular hypertrophy, increased number of premature ventricular complexes, altered QT interval and reduced heart rate variability are all documented in both obese and sudden cardiac death populations. The present review focuses on out-of-hospital sudden cardiac death and potential mechanisms leading to sudden cardiac death in this population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14779072.2014.952283DOI Listing
September 2014

Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention revealing impending left ventricle rupture.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014 Jun;7(6):e67

Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Canada. Electronic address:

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.10.025DOI Listing
June 2014