Publications by authors named "Alyssa Macedo"

5 Publications

  • Page 1 of 1

Building Resilience within Institutions Together with Employees (BRITE): Preliminary experience with implementation in an academic cancer centre.

Healthc Manage Forum 2021 Mar 22;34(2):107-114. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 7989University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Resilience is defined as the capacity to bounce back and respond to pressure, unpredictability, or adversity in an adaptive and effective manner that leads to learning and positive outcomes. BRITE, Building Resilience within Institutions Together with Employees, the focus of this article, is a program designed to equip healthcare workers with skills to foster their resilience as they work; herein, we describe the context, development, and preliminary implementation results.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0840470420981595DOI Listing
March 2021

Symptom screening for constipation in oncology: getting to the bottom of the matter.

Support Care Cancer 2019 Jul 30;27(7):2463-2470. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 16th Floor, Room 749, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.

Purpose: This study seeks to determine whether specific screening for constipation will increase the frequency of clinician response within the context of an established symptom screening program.

Methods: A "constipation" item was added to routine Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) screening in gynecologic oncology clinics during a 7-week trial period, without additional constipation-specific training. Chart audits were then conducted to determine documentation of assessment and intervention for constipation in three groups of patients, those who completed (1) ESAS (n = 477), (2) ESAS-C with constipation (n = 435), and (3) no ESAS (n = 511).

Results: Among patients who were screened for constipation, 17% reported moderate to severe symptoms. Greater constipation severity increased the likelihood of documented assessment (Z = 2.37, p = .018) and intervention (Z = 1.99, p = .048). Overall rates of documented assessment were 36%, with the highest assessment rate in the no ESAS group (χ = 9.505, p = .006), a group with the highest proportion of late-stage disease. No difference in the rate of assessment was found between the ESAS and ESAS-C groups. Overall rates for documentation of intervention were low, and did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: Specific screening for constipation within an established screening program did not increase the documentation rate for constipation assessment or intervention. The inclusion of specific symptoms in multi-symptom screening initiatives should be carefully evaluated in terms of added value versus patient burden. Care pathways should include guidance on triaging results from multi-symptom screening, and clinicians should pay particular attention to patients who are missed from screening altogether, as they may be the most symptomatic group.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4520-7DOI Listing
July 2019

Easier Said Than Done: Keys to Successful Implementation of the Distress Assessment and Response Tool (DART) Program.

J Oncol Pract 2016 05 5;12(5):e513-26. Epub 2016 Apr 5.

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; and BC Children's and Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Purpose: Systematic screening for distress in oncology clinics has gained increasing acceptance as a means to improve cancer care, but its implementation poses enormous challenges. We describe the development and implementation of the Distress Assessment and Response Tool (DART) program in a large urban comprehensive cancer center.

Method: DART is an electronic screening tool used to detect physical and emotional distress and practical concerns and is linked to triaged interprofessional collaborative care pathways. The implementation of DART depended on clinician education, technological innovation, transparent communication, and an evaluation framework based on principles of change management and quality improvement.

Results: There have been 364,378 DART surveys completed since 2010, with a sustained screening rate of > 70% for the past 3 years. High staff satisfaction, increased perception of teamwork, greater clinical attention to the psychosocial needs of patients, patient-clinician communication, and patient satisfaction with care were demonstrated without a resultant increase in referrals to specialized psychosocial services. DART is now a standard of care for all patients attending the cancer center and a quality performance indicator for the organization.

Conclusion: Key factors in the success of DART implementation were the adoption of a programmatic approach, strong institutional commitment, and a primary focus on clinic-based response. We have demonstrated that large-scale routine screening for distress in a cancer center is achievable and has the potential to enhance the cancer care experience for both patients and staff.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2015.010066DOI Listing
May 2016

Functional and work outcomes improve in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who receive targeted, comprehensive occupational therapy.

Arthritis Rheum 2009 Nov;61(11):1522-30

Guy's & St. Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Objective: Work disability is a serious consequence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We conducted a 6-month, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing assessments of function, work, coping, and disease activity in employed patients with RA receiving occupational therapy intervention versus usual care.

Methods: Employed patients with RA with increased perceived work disability risk were identified by the RA Work Instability Scale (WIS; score >or=10). Patients were stratified into medium- (score >or=10 and <17) and high-risk (>or=17) groups, then randomized into occupational therapy or usual care groups. Assessments were conducted at baseline and 6 months. The primary outcome was the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), a standardized patient self-report of function. Other outcomes included the disability index (DI) of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ); Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28); RA WIS; EuroQol Index; visual analog scales (VAS) for pain, work satisfaction, and work performance; and days missed/month. Independent sample t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used.

Results: We recruited 32 employed patients with RA. At baseline the groups were well matched. At 6 months the improvement in the occupational therapy group was significantly greater than that in the usual care group for all functional outcomes (COPM performance P < 0.001, COPM satisfaction P < 0.001, HAQ DI P = 0.02) and most work outcomes (RA WIS [P = 0.04], VAS work satisfaction [P < 0.001], VAS work performance [P = 0.01]). Additionally, Arthritis Helplessness Index (P = 0.02), Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales II pain subscale (P = 0.03), VAS pain (P = 0.007), EuroQol Index (P = 0.02), EuroQol global (P = 0.02), and DAS28 (P = 0.03) scores significantly improved.

Conclusion: Targeted, comprehensive occupational therapy intervention improves functional and work-related outcomes in employed RA patients at risk of work disability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.24563DOI Listing
November 2009

An examination of work instability, functional impairment, and disease activity in employed patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

J Rheumatol 2009 Feb 22;36(2):225-30. Epub 2009 Jan 22.

Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between the Disease Activity Score 28-joint count (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and Rheumatoid Arthritis-Work Instability Scale (RAWIS); and to define thresholds for clinical assessments associated with moderate to high RA-WIS.

Methods: Employed patients with RA were evaluated using DAS28, HAQ, and RA-WIS during routine clinics. Relationships between these assessments were evaluated by simple correlation. Multiple linear regression modeling was performed using RA-WIS as an outcome variable and HAQ, DAS28, age, sex, occupation, and disease duration as input variables. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were then formulated to determine optimal DAS28, and HAQ cutoff points for RA-WIS >or= 10, along with the odds ratio (OR).

Results: Ninety patients with RA completed the RA-WIS, which was moderately correlated with DAS28 (r =0.53) and HAQ (r = 0.66). Fifty-four percent of RA-WIS was explained by DAS28 (p = 0.002), HAQ (p = 0.001), and sex (p = 0.04). A DAS28 of 3.81 and HAQ of 0.55 were clinically important thresholds. High DAS28 and HAQ were associated with high RA-WIS (OR(DAS) 14.17, OR(HAQ) 25.13, OR(DAS+HAQ) 29.9).

Conclusion: Functional impairment and disease activity significantly and independently contributed to patient-perceived work instability risk.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.071001DOI Listing
February 2009
-->