Publications by authors named "Adriá Rosat-Rodrigo"

5 Publications

  • Page 1 of 1

Use of ICG to evaluate the viability of intestine during laparoscopic transabdominal hernioplasty in emergency surgery of incarcerated hernia.

Cir Esp (Engl Ed) 2021 Apr 17;99(4):313-314. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestiva, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.05.014DOI Listing
April 2021

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Surgical Patients Subjected to CIPA Nutrition Screening and Treatment versus Standard Care.

Nutrients 2019 Apr 20;11(4). Epub 2019 Apr 20.

General and Digestive Surgery Department, HUNSC, 38010 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.

Malnutrition is prevalent in surgical patients and leads to comorbidities and a poorer postoperative course. There are no studies that compare the clinical outcomes of implementing a nutrition screening tool in surgical patients with standard clinical practice. An open, non-randomized, controlled study was conducted in general and digestive surgical hospitalized patients, who were either assigned to standard clinical care or to nutrition screening using the Control of Food Intake, Protein, and Anthropometry (CIPA) tool and an associated treatment protocol ( = 210 and 202, respectively). Length of stay, mortality, readmissions, in-hospital complications, transfers to critical care units, and reinterventions were evaluated. Patients in the CIPA group had a higher Charlson index on admission and underwent more oncological and hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgeries. Although not significant, a shorter mean length of stay was observed in the CIPA group (-1.48 days; < 0.246). There were also fewer cases of exitus (seven vs. one) and fewer transfers to critical care units in this group ( = 0.068 for both). No differences were detected in other clinical variables. In conclusion, patients subjected to CIPA nutrition screening and treatment showed better clinical outcomes than those receiving usual clinical care. The results were not statistically significant, possibly due to the heterogeneity across patient groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11040889DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520912PMC
April 2019

Cost-effectiveness of the hospital nutrition screening tool CIPA.

Arch Med Sci 2020 11;16(2):273-281. Epub 2019 Jan 11.

Internal Medicine Department, University Hospital Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.

Introduction: Hospital malnutrition is very common and worsens the clinical course of patients while increasing costs. Lacking clinical-economic studies on the implementation of nutrition screening encouraged the evaluation of the CIPA (Control of Food Intake, Protein, Anthropometry) tool.

Material And Methods: An open, non-randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted on patients admitted to internal medicine and general and digestive surgery wards, who were either assigned to a control (standard hospital clinical care) or to an intervention, CIPA-performing ward (412 and 411, respectively; = 823). Length of stay, mortality, readmission, in-hospital complications, and quality of life were evaluated. Cost-effectiveness was analysed in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

Results: The mean length of stay was higher in the CIPA group, though not significantly (+ 0.95 days; = 0.230). On the surgical ward, more patients from the control group moved to critical care units ( = 0.014); the other clinical variables did not vary. Quality of life at discharge was similar ( = 0.53), although slightly higher in the CIPA group at 3 months ( = 0.089). Patients under CIPA screening had a higher mean cost of € 691.6 and a mean QALY gain over a 3-month period of 0.0042. While the cost per QALY for the internal medicine patients was € 642 282, the results for surgical patients suggest that the screening tool is both less costly and more effective.

Conclusions: The CIPA nutrition screening tool is likely to be cost-effective in surgical but not in internal medicine patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2018.81128DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7069439PMC
January 2019

Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of early detection of patients at nutrition risk during their hospital stay through the new screening method CIPA: a study protocol.

BMC Health Serv Res 2017 04 20;17(1):292. Epub 2017 Apr 20.

General and digestive surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.

Background: Malnutrition is highly prevalent in hospitalized patients and results in a worsened clinical course as well as an increased length of stay, mortality, and costs. Therefore, simple nutrition screening systems, such as CIPA (control of food intake, protein, anthropometry), may be implemented to facilitate the patient's recovery process. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of implementing such screening tool in a tertiary hospital, consistent with the lack of similar, published studies on any hospital nutrition screening system.

Methods: The present study is carried out as an open, controlled, randomized study on patients that were admitted to the Internal Medicine and the General and Digestive Surgery ward; the patients were randomized to either a control or an intervention group (n = 824, thereof 412 patients in each of the two study arms). The control group underwent usual inpatient clinical care, while the intervention group was evaluated with the CIPA screening tool for early detection of malnutrition and treated accordingly. CIPA nutrition screening was performed upon hospital admission and classified positive when at least one of the following parameters was met: 72 h food intake control < 50%, serum albumin < 3 g/dL, body mass index < 18.5 kg/m (or mid-upper arm circumference ≤ 22.5 cm). In this case, the doctor decided on whether or not providing nutrition support. The following variables will be evaluated: hospital length of stay (primary endpoint), mortality, 3-month readmission, and in-hospital complications. Likewise, the quality of life questionnaires EQ-5D-5 L are being collected for all patients at hospital admission, discharge, and 3 months post-discharge. Analysis of cost-effectiveness will be performed by measuring effectiveness in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The cost per patient will be established by identifying health care resource utilization; cost-effectiveness will be determined through the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We will calculate the incremental cost per QALY gained with respect to the intervention.

Discussion: This ongoing trial aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of implementing the malnutrition screening tool CIPA in a tertiary hospital.

Trial Registration: Clinical Trial.gov ( NCT02721706 ). First receivevd: March 1, 2016 Last updated: April 8, 2017 Last verified: April 2017.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2218-zDOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397674PMC
April 2017

[Crossed renal ectopia in a patient with a complicated sigma neoplasia].

Cir Cir 2017 Dec 21;85 Suppl 1:72-75. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, España.

Background: Crossed renal ectopia is a rare pathology that is often asymptomatic. Intraoperative detection with a sigma complicated neoplasia is more infrequent and requires correct management to avoid a renal ureteral injury.

Aim: To present a case report of a patient with a sigma complicated neoplasia and a crossed renal ectopia detected incidentally.

Case Report: We present the case of a 62-year-old man that was submitted for emergency surgery for a sigma perforated neoplasm, and who presented with a previously undiagnosed left-side CRE. During surgery there was a need to insert 2-double-J stents as a guide to both ureters and to avoid any injury to them.

Discussion: Crossed renal ectopia is a rare, often asymptomatic entity, the diagnosis of which is usually incidental. In our case, the detection of a concomitant complicated neoplasm, required identification of both ureters due the anatomic doubt of its localization and to avoid them being injured. In conclusion, upon finding a casual crossed renal ectopia during an emergency surgery of sigma, we recommend the identification of the ureters to facilitate its location and to avoid any injury to the ureters.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.circir.2016.10.018DOI Listing
December 2017
-->