Publications by authors named "Abit Yaman"

3 Publications

  • Page 1 of 1

The effect of Farnesoid X receptor agonist tropifexor on liver damage in rats with experimental obstructive jaundice.

Acta Cir Bras 2021 25;36(9):e360902. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

MD. University of Sharjah - College of Medicine - Clinical Sciences Department - Sharjah, UAE.

Purpose: To investigate experimentally the effects of Tropifexor, a farnesoid X receptor agonist, on liver injury in rats with obstructive jaundice.

Methods: Forty healthy Wistar albino female rats were divided randomly in selected groups. These groups were the sham group, control group, vehicle solution group, Ursodeoxycholic acid group and Tropifexor group. Experimental obstructive jaundice was created in all groups, except the sham one. In the blood samples obtained, aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), total bilirubin and direct bilirubin levels were established and recorded. Additionally, liver malondialdehyde, myeloperoxidase and catalase enzyme activity in the tissue samples were studied. Histopathological analysis was also performed.

Results: No statistical difference was found between the control group and the Tropifexor group when AST, ALT and ALP values were compared. However, it was found that the Tropifexor group had statistically significant decreases in the values of GGT, total bilirubin and direct bilirubin (p < 0.05). Additionally, Tropifexor decreased the median values of malondialdehyde and myeloperoxidase, but this difference was not statistically significant compared to the control group. Finally, the Tropifexor group was statistically significant in recurring histopathological liver damage indicators (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Tropifexor reduced liver damage due to obstructive jaundice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ACB360902DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555997PMC
November 2021

The Adjunctive Effect of DuraSeal® vs. 2-Octyl-Cyanoacrylate on Delayed Repair of Gastric Perforation: An Experimental Study.

J Invest Surg 2021 Feb 28:1-7. Epub 2021 Feb 28.

General Surgery, Health Sciences University, Adana Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey.

Objective: Delayed primary suture closure of gastric perforation is prone to dehiscence hence the repaired area should be buttressed to avoid re-operation. We aimed to investigate whether DuraSeal®(DS) has a potent adjunctive effect on delayed closure of gastric perforation comparing with 2-octly-cyanoacrylate(CYN) in an experimental model.

Methods: Sixty rats were randomly divided into 6 groups. All subjected to gastric perforation, subsequently perforation areas were repaired by primary suturing, delayed repair was performed 12 h after surgery. According to DS or CYN application on anastomosis, the groups were classified as control(C), delayed control(CD), closure with CYN(CYN), delayed closure with CYN(D-CYN), closure with DS(DS), delayed closure with DS(D-DS).After euthanization on POD 7,anastomotic bursting pressure(ABP) were measured. Tissue samples were taken for histopathological examination and hydroxyproline(TH) assessment.

Results: Delayed condition significantly reduced ABP and TH levels in CD group comparing with all groups(p < 0.01).Either CYN or DS application on delayed repaired area significantly raised the measure of ABP and TH up to the levels of C group(p < 0.05,comparing with CD).Microscopically,either CYN or DS application significantly improved tissue necrosis, submucosal bridging and collagen formation comparing with CD group(p < 0.012).There were no difference regarding ABP, TH and tissue healing between each CYN and DS groups.

Conclusion: DuraSeal® application on sutured gastric perforation area yielded a significant adjunctive effect both in normal and delayed conditions. However, DuraSeal® revealed no superior effect to CYN in both condition.Our results demonstrated that the clinical use of DuraSeal® can be considered for reinforcing the sutured line in patients undergoing delayed surgery for gastric perforation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2021.1887414DOI Listing
February 2021

The potential efficacy of Survanta (r) and Seprafilm (r) on preventing intra-abdominal adhesions in rats.

Acta Cir Bras 2016 Jun;31(6):389-95

PhD, Department of Pathology, Cukurova University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey. Histopathological examinations, manuscript review.

Purpose: To investigate the potential efficacy of beractant (Survanta(r)) and Seprafilm(r) on the prevention of postoperative adhesions.

Methods: Forty Wistar-albino female rats were used. The rats were randomly allocated into four groups of 10 rats each as control group (CG), beractant group (BG), Seprafilm(r) group (SG), and combined group (COG). All rats underwent cecal abrasion via midline laparotomy. Before abdominal closure, isotonic saline, beractant, Seprafilm, and combined agents were intraperitoneally administered. Adhesions were classified macroscopically with Canbaz Scoring System on postoperative day 10. Ceacum was resected for histopathological assessment.

Results: Macroscopic adhesion scores were significantly lower in BG, SG, and COG than CG (p<0.05); (45%, 15%, 25%, and 15%; respectively). Histopathological assessment revealed a reduced inflammation and fibrosis score in the study groups than CG (p<0.05). In BG, adhesion development, inflammation and fibrosis scores were lower than SG; however, it was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Intra-abdominal application of beractant is significantly effective for the prevention of adhesion formation with no adverse effect by covering the whole peritoneal mesothelium with excellent gliding properties in a rat model. The combination of both agents is also effective in reducing adhesion formation, however, not superior to single beractant application.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-865020160060000005DOI Listing
June 2016
-->