Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2020 Oct 15;2(5):e200004. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (C.P.S.B., A.J.N., P.v.O., R.N.P.) and Cardiology (S.M.B.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (J.J.M.W.); Department of Research and Development, Pie Medical Imaging BV, Maastricht, the Netherlands (J.P.A.); and Departments of Cardiology (G.P.B., S.A.J.C.) and Radiology (T.L.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Purpose: To compare the accuracy of semiautomated flow tracking with that of semiautomated valve tracking in the quantification of mitral valve (MV) regurgitation from clinical four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI data obtained in patients with mild, moderate, or severe MV regurgitation.
Materials And Methods: The 4D flow MRI data were retrospectively collected from 30 patients (21 men; mean age, 61 years ± 10 [standard deviation]) who underwent 4D flow MRI from 2006 to 2016. Ten patients had mild MV regurgitation, nine had moderate MV regurgitation, and 11 had severe MV regurgitation, as diagnosed by using semiquantitative echocardiography. The regurgitant volume (Rvol) across the MV was obtained using three methods: indirect quantification of Rvol (Rvol), semiautomated quantification of Rvol using valve tracking (Rvol), and semiautomated quantification of Rvol using flow tracking (Rvol). A second observer repeated the measurements. Aortic valve flow was quantified as well to test for intervalve consistency. The Wilcoxon signed rank test, orthogonal regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and coefficients of variation were used to assess agreement among measurements and between observers.
Results: Rvol was higher (median, 24.8 mL; interquartile range [IQR], 14.3-45.7 mL) than Rvol (median, 9.9 mL; IQR, 6.0-16.9 mL; < .001). Both Rvol and Rvol differed significantly from Rvol (median, 19.1 mL; IQR, 4.1-47.5 mL; = .03). Rvol agreed more with Rvol ( = 0.78 + 12, = 0.88) than with Rvol ( = 0.16 + 8.1, = 0.53). Bland-Altman analysis revealed underestimation of Rvol in severe MV regurgitation. Interobserver agreement was excellent for Rvol ( = 0.95, coefficient of variation = 27%) and moderate for Rvol ( = 0.72, coefficient of variation = 57%). Orthogonal regression demonstrated better intervalve consistency for flow tracking ( = 1.2 - 13.4, = 0.82) than for valve tracking ( = 2.7 - 92.4, = 0.67).
Conclusion: Flow tracking enables more accurate 4D flow MRI-derived MV regurgitation quantification than valve tracking in terms of agreement with indirect quantification and intervalve consistency, particularly in severe MV regurgitation.© RSNA, 2020.